1 / 10

Track 4 Coordinator’s Report

Track 4 Coordinator’s Report. Nick Brook and Ruth Pordes May 24th. Track 5 Programme. Themes - Distributed Computing Security and VO management Experiment Grid Systems Analysis Experience and Systems Computing Models Infrastructure: Monitoring, Information Services,

eben
Download Presentation

Track 4 Coordinator’s Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Track 4 Coordinator’s Report Nick Brook and Ruth Pordes May 24th

  2. Track 5 Programme • Themes - Distributed Computing • Security and VO management • Experiment Grid Systems • Analysis Experience and Systems • Computing Models • Infrastructure: Monitoring, Information Services, • Data Management, Databases and Storage

  3. 1a Security and VO 1b General Grid Infrastructures/Systems 2a Monitoring 2b Experiment Grid Systems 3a Data Management, Storage, Databases 3b Workload & Workflows 4a Data Management, Storage, Databases 4b Deployment and Operations 5 Production Experience 6 Analysis Systems and Experience

  4. Oral Abstracts Per Session • 1a : 224 (from track 5) ,191,194,249,363,439 • 1b: 171,184/71,287/430,300/308,228,443 • 2a: 480, 202/344,274/396,393/89*,417,451 • 2b: 210,231,232/364,309,436/440, 43 • 3a & 4a: 107,142/189,162,278,253/294,334,181/345,343,460,392,453/454,338 • 3b: 318, 321,337,69,86,365/377 • 4b: 158,206,186/389,192,307,455 • 5: 339,145/146/165/178/193,285/470/97,38/441/362,403,428 • 6: 113/366*,115/357, 136,319,401,429 • 84 papers with merging into 60 oral slots.

  5. Transfers - Track 4 <-> Track 1 • 217, 219 , 258 accepted by Track 1.

  6. Transfers Track 4 <-> Track 2 • Track 2 requested Track 4 take 362, 410, 430, 438 • our response: • 362 - merged with 38/441 in session 5 track 4 • 410 to Track 5 or Track 2 as a poster • 430 - merged with 287 in session 1b track 4 • 438 - poster in track 4 • Track 4 requests transfer to Track 2 • 65, 99 - recommend poster • 198, 299, 310, 351

  7. Transfers Track 4<-> Track 3 • Track 3 requested Track 4 take: 128, 156, 226, 276, 327, 383, 385, 471, 480 • We agree with all but 226 which we think should stay in track 3 • 128, 156, 276, 327,383,471 will be posters (we think 471 should be a poster in track 5 though) • 385 is in session 3b • 480 is in session 2a • Track 4 requests that Track 3 takes: • 447 - conditions databases

  8. Transfers Track 4<-> Track 5 • Track 5 requested 33, 122, 146, 156, 287, 321,343,458,463 to Track 4 • we accept all these except 458 • 33, 122,146,156, 463 - as posters • 287 is an oral in session 1 b • 321 is an oral in session 3b • 343 is an oral in session 3a/4a • Track 4 asks Track 5 to take 464, 476,

  9. Track 4 Abstracts

  10. Observations • We initially had 179 abstracts. This did not quite mesh with John’s numbers? • Given 84 papers in orals, 4 plenary and the track moves this is 90-100 posters. Do we need to specify them or will they fall out from the list? • We would ask for help to make the merges.

More Related