MT Continuum Status

1. MT Continuum Status Gerry Cullison, SSP Mark Campbell, MT Continuum Team Jamie Stewart, AIM team 18 Sep 12

2. Overview • MT Continuum overview • Application to other communities • Project status • Lessons learned for other NETC communities • SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change

3. MT Continuum Project Strategic Systems Programs (SSP) re-engineering 30+ week training pipeline for TRIDENT Ballistic Submarine (SSBN) Missile Techs (MTs) into blended just-enough/just-in-time ILE-conformant Instructor Led (ILT) and Interactive Multimedia Instruction(IMI) segments AIM CPM and LO Module toolsets part of SSP’s baseline business process for this re-engineering First major end-to-end design, development, and maintenance project that’s defining CPM/LO Module business rules and data exchange mechanisms

4. MT Continuum Project MT Continuum team: SSP - Requirements Owners, Afloat Delivery System Contractor team – ILT development, IMI Storyboard development, SMEs NAWCTSD / AIM team - CPM/LO Module support NUWC – LMS (Seaware) LSI, Inc. - ISD and IMI design/development CFS – CM/QA agent for SSP Fleet – SMEs

5. Application to Other Communities • Based on NETC-mandated JDTA as fleet performance requirement basis for learning content design and development (NAVEDTRA 137) • Closely coordinated with NAVEDTRA 136 development • Hands-on production phase development of complete LO Module ILT lessons/sections and design of IMI lessons/sections as well as definition of new JDTA/LO Module versioning concepts • Integrated development and maintenance environment for blended, SCORM and 136-compliant learning content • Bi-directional interface between LO Module and LSI Venus.net CBT toolset for IMI development/maint.

6. Project Status • Plan & Analyze Phases Completed • JDTA – 3 Projects (Operator/Technician /Manager) • Revision/refinement will be needed. • Too granular • Not completely ‘Task based with knowledge to support performance’ centric. KPL and SPL (NAVEDTRA 137) • Revised project structure supports Operator, Technician and Manager training via initial training and follow on At Sea & Ashore Phases.

7. Project Status • Design Phase On going (In conjunction w/Development) • Approval of learning objectives (COI) • Refining levelization between initial operator and later technician phases • Separation of performance and knowledge objectives • Straight conversion of performance objectives to learning objectives • COI Revision completed September 2012 • ISD considerations elements as part of script-storyboard (SSB) effort • A significant effort that extends SSB production task time in the Development Phase. • Early and assertive ISD involvement and close ISD/SME collaboration. • Content thread concept – developing content that bridges learning levels

8. Project Status • Design Phase On Going (In conjunction w/Development) • Comprehensive Assessment Design Strategy still needed • NAVEDTRA 132 Revision needed • Blended assessment to compliment blended delivery • Performance Assessment needs further development • Delivery Method Analysis Process still needed • Scientific/Justifiable/Repeatable • Development Phase (15 May 2011) • LOM via NETPDTC server – CPM via AIMEREON server • Central Site connectivity still a challenge

9. Project Status • Development Phase (15 May 2011) • Maturity of Design Documents and Processes • IMDP, Learning Objectives (ISD Considerations), Process Documents, Assessment Design, Time to Train Estimations, Delivery Method Analysis • Establish change request process in Design Phase • Storyboard Training (IMI) • Understanding skill mix and team responsibilities • Levelization of content • Early and frequent collaboration

10. SSP Electronic Classroom Control Software Change • SSP Current Approach: Integrate CCS into the SSP LMS • Design in progress • Defining requirements and building use cases

11. Questions?