70 likes | 125 Views
Review of Post-Processualism. Post –Processualism is the post-modernist in Archaeology Questions rationality Objectivity Science as an Intellectual structure science is not politically neutral. Components of Post-Processual Research Structure. Interpretation, not explanation
E N D
Review of Post-Processualism • Post –Processualism is the post-modernist in Archaeology • Questions rationality • Objectivity • Science as an Intellectual structure science is not politically neutral
Components of Post-Processual Research Structure • Interpretation, not explanation • Interpretation as relative, contingent and subjective (because objectivity is not possible) • giving voice to the disenfranchized • Multiple views/voices of the past--- • Big ideas: ideology, gender, power, agency, ethnicity • How distinguish between various versions of the past? ( Evaluation is not stressed.)
CONTRIBUTIONS OF POST-PROCESSUALISM • Generated Considerable Debate • The Political Context of Archaeology • Broadening the Discipline in terms of Practioners Research Questions • The Structure of Museums • Archaeological Ethics
Ideas in Science and Post-ProcessualismWhat is theory? • Theory in Science: • Coherent intellectual structure • Terms and relations between terms laid out • Theory is narrowly and precisely defined • explanatory theory--- Addresses the question of WHY
THEORY IN POST-PROCESSUALISM • Theory as Ideas • Why do archaeology • social and cultural context of archaeology • “All Observations are theory-laden” • Theory as Attitude ( Michael Shanks) • Philosophy: • Agency, Marxism, Hemenuitics