MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

1. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED Welcome Presentation on Mumbai Trans-Harbour Link Project

2. MUMBAI TRANS HARBOUR LINK (SEWRI NHAVA SEA LINK)

3. FUTURE GROWTH LIMITED North-South EXPANSION ONLY WAY TO EXPAND

4. TIME TO ACT BEFORE ITS TOO LATE! 1978-80 Second committee 1991 Paranjpaye committee 1981-83 Steering committee (JRD Tata committee) 1996 BMRDA study 1983 CRRI study 2001 1970-72 First committee (Nizamuddin committee) 30 years of study recommends urgent need to expand in East-West direction 1970 BMR PB Report 3 DECADES OF STUDIES

5. vehicle operating cost 1000 cr. per annum travel time cost 30% MTHL PROVIDES SOLUTIONS Create better living conditions Encourage mass transit Connect cities, ports, airports by road, rail Disperse traffic, growth, population Better sharing of resources Long term projection EW expansion Traffic handled by MTHL by 2016 Airoli train 1, 25,000 pass./day road 93,000 PCU/day Mumbai Navi Mumbai Thane Saving in cost by 2016 Mumbai Trans Harbour Link Siwri (JRD Tata Bridge) Nhava Pollution reduction at intersections MPT Noise reduction JNPT 10-12 db

6. NH4 2016 TODAY (with MTHL) Even dispersal, Efficient performance Road, Rail capacity Saturated NH17 2016 NH4 NH4 (without MTHL) Do we have space for widening ? MTHL To Mumbai Pune Expressway Uran-Panvel Link NH17 NH17 To Goa and western coast ROAD, RAIL REQUIREMENTS BY 2016

7. ALTERNATIVE ROUTES CONSIDERED Airoli Link Thane Link NH4 Panvel Sewri To Pune and central areas MTHL Kon Nhava Mumbai-Pune Expressway Uran-Panvel Link NH17 To Goa and western coast

8. COMMUTE TIME DISPERSAL OF LAND USE MTHL V/S CURRENT TRAVEL PATTERN Airoli Link Thane Link NH4 Panvel 2 :00 hour Sewri MTHL Mumbai-Pune Expressway Kon 0:30 hour JNPT NH4B To Pune and central areas Zone II Zone I Uran-Panvel Link Zone III NH17 To Goa and western coast

9. MUMBAI TRANS HARBOUR LINK Mumbai NH4 9:10AM Multilevel parking lot 14 lane Toll Plaza Nhava Kon 9:00AM 9:30AM CST Rail yard Uran Bridge length : 25 km. Construction period: 4 years Cost : 5000 cr. Commute time from Mumbai cut by 1:30 hr!

10. CONNECTING TO MTHL Wadala Bandra Worli Rail, road link Savarkar Marg Senapati Bapat Marg sewri Ambedkar Marg Rafi Ahmed Kidwai Marg Western rail MPT Central rail freight Harbour rail GPO CST Hutatma Chowk commuters Gateway of India tourists

11. FUNDING OF THE PROJECT • DEVELOPMENT CESS IN BENEFICIARY ZONES • CESS ON REGISTRATION OF SALE OF LAND IN BENEFICIARY ZONES • INITIAL CONTRIBUTION FROM BENEFICIARY ORGANISATIONS • TOLL & ADVERTISEMENT REVENUE

12. INFLUENCE ZONE OF PROJECT

13. MTHL ( JRD TATA BRIDGE ) ELEVATED ROADS Rafi Ahmad Kidwai Marg Eastern Expressway Worli - Bandra Sea Link Elphinston Road Acharya Donde Marg Siwri MTHL Senapati Bapat Marg Ambedkar Marg Ganpatrao Kadam Marg D’Mello Road SEWRI JUNCTION E. Moses Road Western Rail Centeral Rail Harbour Rail

14. MTHL ( JRD TATA BRIDGE ) MULTILEVEL PARKING LOT MODERN TOLL PLAZA Encourage use of mass transit Saving in fuel cost Car elevators, ramps provided Ticket validation machines 16 lane toll plaza automated dispersal of traffic Traffic monitoring facility

16. MTHL ( JRD TATA BRIDGE ) Ballast-less rail track to minimize load on bridge 12 car rake of passenger capacity 3500 to 1200 seats/rake 2 track rail link MUMBAI NHAVA 8 lane road link RAIL + ROAD LINK

18. MTHL ( JRD TATA BRIDGE ) ROAD AT GRADE VIADUCTS Span, height to accommodate navigation channels Allows visual transparency Viaducts preferred over embankment on environment ground 25m. 120m. - 600m.

19. BENIFITS OF MTHL Better living conditions productivity trade prosperity growth dispersal of traffic ambient air quality uniform use of resources employment better land use ENVIRONMENT THOUGHT CONSIDERATION COEXISTANCE RESPECT Traffic congestion commute time pollution health hazard noise pollution stress

20. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES FEASIBILITY STUDIES PLANNING CONSTRUCTION

21. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES FEASIBILITY STUDIES Alignment technically feasible Project is financially viable In depth analysis of biotic conditions Eco-friendly route chosen No displacement of existing settlement Better employment opportunities Better dispersal of traffics Sea Link is permitted in CRZ

22. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES PLANNING Use of latest technology Aesthetic designs Large spans used Strict compliance with laws Future expansion accommodated Better distribution of land use Modern traffic surveillance and monitoring

23. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES CONSTRUCTION Modern construction techniques Use of prefabricated components Use of corrosion resistant steel Construction camps monitored Quality assurance Effective environment management during construction covering material transport, labour

24. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES MAINTENANCE SAFETY BIOTIC CONDITIONS

25. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES MAINTENANCE Administration on BOT basis Funds generated by toll Low maintenance structure Low maintenance plantation Arboriculture

26. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES SAFETY Disaster Management Plan Traffic surveillance and monitoring Insurance against medical expenses in case of accidents

27. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES BIOTIC CONDITIONS Environment Management Plan Green belt avenue plantation along solid approaches Periodic monitoring of environmental parameters No adverse impact on account of this project

28. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Viaducts preserve existing terrain Minimum excavation, grading No effect on tidal conditions Marine life least disturbed EARTH WATER ELEMENTS OF NATURE AIR FIRE Minimum emission due to smooth traffic Reduction in air, noise pollution Ambient air quality improved in the city Safety exits provided Service areas provided Highest quality materials used Appropriate illumination, signs

29. MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORP. LTD.

30. VISION FOR THE MILLENNIUM COMMUNICATION GROWTH PROGRESS PROSPERITY BETTER LIVING CONDITIONS

31. PRESENT STATUS • Feasibility & EIA Studies of the main bridge Completed • Environmental Public Hearing held on 21st April 1999 and 24th Dec. 1999 • Report submitted by GOM to MoEF, GOI in March 2001 • Formal submission of Application & Questionnaire to MoEF on 24th May 2001 • MoEF needs clearance of MOST

32. PROPOSED ACTION PLAN • Discussion with MbPT & MOST for formal clearance of the Alignment • To obtain Environmental clearance from MoEF • To appoint a financial consultant to prepare a financing plan and development strategies • State Govt. to set up a high level steering committee under C.S. • MSRDC to set up a full time multi - disciplinary project team

33. PROPOSED ACTION PLAN (Contd..,) • To obtain approval of the cabinet/ state govt. to financial plan and development strategies • To appoint Consultant for study of dispersal system and preparation of plans and estimates • To set up a SPV for the project • To include beneficiary zone in the boundary of Navi Mumbai • To appoint Project Management Consultant • Land acquisition on Mumbai & main land side • To take up implementation of the project by inviting bids

34. THANK YOU MSRDC LTD (www.msrdc.org)