1 / 24

Desk Organizer MFG 112-Fall 2003 Dr. John W. Sinn

Anti-Organized Group. Desk Organizer MFG 112-Fall 2003 Dr. John W. Sinn. Team Leaders Eric Poffenbaugh & Rocky VanCleve. Team 2 Tony Roop Tom Brooks. Team 3 Donald Hixon Scott Chapman Erik Haeft. Team 1 Eric Bridge Craig Sykes. Team Members. What are we building?. Desk Organizer

ila-bell
Download Presentation

Desk Organizer MFG 112-Fall 2003 Dr. John W. Sinn

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Anti-Organized Group Desk Organizer MFG 112-Fall 2003 Dr. John W. Sinn

  2. Team Leaders Eric Poffenbaugh & Rocky VanCleve Team 2 Tony Roop Tom Brooks Team 3 Donald Hixon Scott Chapman Erik Haeft Team 1 Eric Bridge Craig Sykes Team Members

  3. What are we building? • Desk Organizer • Features • Drawer for storage • Lamp for light • Envelope Slots for mail • Pencil holder for writing utensils • Inside storage for paper clips and misc. • Area underneath for paper storage

  4. Objectives • Objectives • Build a quality product. • Meet and exceed the consumers needs. • People who are disorganized, that needs something to store things that can provide some light. • Minimize production costs. • Mission Statement • The aim of our company is to provide quality products and services to those who can benefit from our superior ingenuity and engineering for many years to come.

  5. Size of Product • Depth-9” • Width- 12” • Height- 5” • 1” gap underneath for paper storage

  6. The First Proto

  7. How We Got There • Startup Activity • Basic info on the formation of the team. • Brought the members together. • Tool 1 • Tool 2 • Tool 3 • Phase 1

  8. How We Got There 2 • Tool 4 • Tool 5 • Tool 6 • Phase 2

  9. Tool 1 • Technical foundations for Industrial Technology, Technological Systems • Infrastructural competitiveness • Passion for quality and productivity • Basic technological principles, essential knowledge • Energy and resources • Production • Electromechanical technology • Transportation • Communications • Technical role of the technologist

  10. Tool 2 • Harvesting and refinement • Materials classification • Material considerations • The science of materials' structure • Specific materials' characteristics • Materials testing • Materials environmental issues • Major technological processes

  11. Plant Layout

  12. Tool 3 • Process and applications engineering • Market research for product development • The design process • Material considerations • Innovation • Applied technical research

  13. See what other teams are doing to get a picture of what is working and what isn’t. Decide what SDA’s we are going to accomplish and assign them to members of the team. Post a due date for tool table postings before due date so that compilers can gather information for their tools. Post information so that it can be compiled and posted for grading. Review previous tools grading to figure out what we need to improve on. Flow Chart

  14. Tool 4 • Cost Analysis • Productivity Improvement • Traditional Productivity tools • Japanese Techniques

  15. Tool 5 • Quality Systems • Metrology and Inspection • Statistics in Quality • Data-Based Systems • 8-D Systems • Reliability and Quality • Synchronized Kaizen Opportunities

  16. Tool 6 • Automation and computer integration • Cad-Cam systems plus • Computer analysis and control • Networks, artificial intelligence and beyond

  17. Objectives to Mass Produce • Form a Workable Assembly Line • Increase Product Stability • Reduce Waste and Defects • Alter Design to meet Consumer Needs • Set a Daily Production Quota

  18. How did we Reach Them • Got more members involved with production • Used thicker wood, different fasteners, stronger joints • Measure twice cut once • Different Drawer locations • Wanted to assemble 5 per day

  19. Design Changes • Different Materials • Plywood to Pine • ½” to 1” Pencil Holder • 9 Holes to 5 Holes Eliminate nail heads • Use biscuit joints instead

  20. Final Product

  21. Jigs We Used

  22. Problems We Encountered • Materials • Wood Defects • Crooks • Cupped • Warped

  23. Problems We Encountered • Band Saw • Too thin of a blade • No clamping space • Machines we could have used • Planer to take care of warped wood • Air nailer to fasten pieces

  24. Need more info? • Go to • http://www.indeed311.com/teamao • E-mail epoffen@bgnet.bgsu.edu • We will send you the info you desire

More Related