1 / 22

The Economic system in the MENA region and its possible contribution to the Arab Spring

The Economic system in the MENA region and its possible contribution to the Arab Spring. Mohamed Bouazizi – Tunisian street vendor. From Mohamed Bouazizi .... …. to Economics in North Africa. Before the Spring.

jania
Download Presentation

The Economic system in the MENA region and its possible contribution to the Arab Spring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Economicsystem in the MENA regionanditspossiblecontributiontotheArab Spring

  2. Mohamed Bouazizi – Tunisianstreetvendor

  3. From Mohamed Bouazizi....….to Economics in North Africa

  4. Beforethe Spring • Status quo (2010):- Economic elites obtain most of privatized assets thanks to political connections - Firms are not treated uniformly  Corruption & tax rates - Lack of jobs in private sector High unemployment rates for young people- Old businessmen Youth in majority- Spike in global foodprices

  5. Beforethe Spring Political concerns about voice/human rights + Lack of jobs and crony capitalism + Catalyst: Mohamed Bouazizi  ARAB SPRING

  6. Entrepreneursas Drivers of Change

  7. Entrepreneursas Drivers of Change • Entrepreneurs don’t participate in the protests in an open and collective manner • ONLY: labor unions, youth movements, leftish/islamist movements, bloggers • Reasons for not participating: 1. Existing business organizations are controlled by incumbents and lack independence from the regimes in place2. Associations for SMEs simply do not exist 3. Are sensitive to retaliation by the regimes in place can deprive them of their livelihood

  8. Entrepreneursas Drivers of Change • Only way to participate in protests as civilians Other ways of bringing political changes?  SMEs as contributor to political change

  9. Entrepreneursas Drivers of Change • Promoting social mobility by expanding middle class • Adding fresh blood to entrepreneur elites • Decentralize economic power away from big entrepreneurs supporting the regime • Advocate for institutional reforms that weaken the economics elite’s capacitiy to capture the benefits of economic reforms • Implementing more transparent/democratic procedures within business associations can spill over into civil society/political sector

  10. LinkagebetweenEntrepreneurshipandother Drivers of Change

  11. LinkagebetweenEntrepreneurshipandother Drivers of Change • LinkedwithissueofMIGRATION • Can influenceentrepreneurshipby:- BRAIN DRAIN: Deprive emigrant countries of their more entrepreneurial/creative individuals- CIRCULAR MIGRATION: Co-development, mainly via monetary remittancestend to finance only consumption, housing improvement, health care etc. don’t foster entrepreneurship- BRAIN CIRCULATION: Mobility of competence/skills through network of knowledge/innovation

  12. LinkagebetweenEntrepreneurshipandother Drivers of Change • Morocco, Egypt, Lebanon:- very significant flows of monetary remittances - but seldom corridor of goods, information, knowledge, services etc MONEY FOREIGN COUNTRY HOME INFORMATION

  13. LinkagebetweenEntrepreneurshipandother Drivers of Change • Small attemptsforBRAIN CIRCULATION model: offers new business opportunities and changes way businesses are managed opportunity to develop a new segment of middle-class professionals/entrepreneurs

  14. Final Remarks: Towards more comprehensive EU, US, and Transatlantic Perspectives on Entrepreneurship in North Africa

  15. Final Remarks What we have seen so far: Small/very small (often individual/family) companies are a potential driver for:ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, POLITICAL CHANGE

  16. Final Remarks What have the EU/USA done so far to promote North African entrepreneurships and SMEs?

  17. Final Remarks 1. • Seldom support of small entrepreneurs/microentrepreneurs • Rarely considered, consulted or even informed EU/USA have to start to include them in their bilateral negotiations with governments Inclusion of all actors, e.g. traditional/small farmers, consumer associations, representatives of civil society (including religiously ones)

  18. Final Remarks 2. • Troubled relationship between business & democratization • Business representatives are seldom invited to civil society meetings, are not considered capable of organizing themselves include the business sector in democracy process

  19. Final Remarks 3. • Euro-Mediterranean relations mainly focus on governments/big policy designs  exclusion of SMEs Solution: • Support initiatives that promote SMEs • Measures directly targeting SMEs • Improve economic/legal institutions/infrastructures that benefit micro/small businesses

  20. Final Remarks 4. • Horizontal policy reform EU/USA should consider offering a consistent package of incentives, including financial assistance & better access to THEIR markets for NA goods, services, workers

  21. Final Remarks Possibilities of economic change through:- Young population  pave the way for more individualistic approaches- Migration  building of entrepreneurial bridges- Effective economic integration with EU/USA process of political/economic liberalization

  22. Final Remarks Key objectives for the future: • JOB CREATION • ECONOMIC GROWTH • SOCIAL STABILITY • DECENTRALIZATION OF ECONOMIC POWER STRUCTURES

More Related