1 / 13

Library Review Senate Update - March 26

Library Review Senate Update - March 26. July – Sept. 2011. Oct. 2011 – April 2012. May – June 2012. Summer 2012. Fall 2012. Why a strategic review?. Undertaking the Library Review is in part due diligence It is something we should simply do as we move forward

joseph-atkinson
Download Presentation

Library Review Senate Update - March 26

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Library ReviewSenate Update - March 26 July – Sept. 2011 Oct. 2011 – April 2012 May – June 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012

  2. Why a strategic review? • Undertaking the Library Review is in part due diligence • It is something we should simply do as we move forward • “Establish a ‘culture’ of periodic reviews for all academic support activities” • Sixth Decade Plan, Recommendation 17 • Integrating and dovetailing with planning now underway across campus

  3. The Library Review will include at a minimum • Engagement with all Library staff • Engagement with Library users & stakeholders • A scan of the current environment • Aligning our resources with our strategic directions • Integrating with the current Mid Cycle Review • A review and identification of appropriate impact, outcome and assessment measures

  4. The Library Review is in brief • Due diligence • Engaging with each other • Engaging with our users • Building on our strengths • Strategic & forward looking

  5. The Library Review sets the stage for • Annual planning & priorities process • Aligning resources with strategic directions • Integrating with campus directions & plans

  6. A lot is happening in tandem • Mid Cycle Review process • Strategic planning in the Faculties • Departmental reviews, e.g. CECA, Library • HR initiated developments, e.g. • Strategic Workplace Planning (SWP) • Leadership Foundations for Ongoing Development pilot (LF40D) • etc.

  7. Campus-wide opportunities • Coordination & integration • Collaboration & partnerships • Leveraging campus strengths • Focused & complementary activities

  8. Library ReviewSelf-study stages July – Sept. 2011 Oct. 2011 – April 2012 May – June 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012

  9. Self-study stages • Departmental and Committee Self Studies (Oct. – Dec. 2011) • Engage all Library staff • Synthesizing of Reports (Dec. 2011 – Feb. 2012) • Retreat to synthesize data • Develop and define working groups based on key themes • Working groups & strategic themes (Feb. – May 2012) • Establish working groups • Engage with stakeholders & users

  10. Strategic self-study themes • Advancing research & scholarship • Enabling student success • New skills for new times • New spaces for new times

  11. Working Groups • Advancing Research and Scholarship • Jane Forgay & Jennifer Haas • Enabling Student Success • Eva Dodsworth & Kathy MacDonald • New Skills for New Times • Alison Hitchens & Jamie Reilly • New Spaces for New Times • Sharon Lamont & Scott Nicoll • Data Support group • Annie Belanger

  12. Working Groups – Terms of Ref. • The Library’s current strengths • Environmental external scan • Future opportunities • Identify challenges & gaps • Engage with stakeholders/users • Consistency with campus directions • Relationship to other campus activities

  13. Questions?http://www.lib.uwaterloo.ca/libreview/ July – Sept. 2011 Oct. 2011 – April 2012 May – June 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012

More Related