180 likes | 189 Views
This presentation explores the ecological tax reform in Germany and its special provisions for energy-intensive businesses, along with insights into the climate change levy in the UK. Topics include motives for tax concessions, design of special provisions, and perspectives for Germany's tax system. It delves into the revenue-neutral tax reform, energy taxation, and strategies to address carbon leakage. The comparison between German and UK special provisions sheds light on different approaches to tax incentives. The text highlights the complexities of balancing economic, environmental, and political factors in tax policy design.
E N D
Tax Relief for energy-intensive business in the framework of the ecological tax reform and the climate change levyMichael KohlhaasPresented atECOTAXES IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED KINGDOM - A BUSINESS VIEWBerlin, 25 June 2004
Outline • Ecological Tax Reform in Germany • What are special provisions / tax concessions? • Motives for tax concessions • Criteria and constraints for special provisions • Design of special provisions • Tax concessions in Germany and the UK • Perspectives for Germany
Ecological tax reform in Germany • Revenue-neutral tax reform • 5 steps between 1999 and 2003 • Energy taxation • Increase of taxes on petroleum products • New tax on electricity • Special provisions for energy-intensive production • Additional revenue about € 18.6 milliard (billion) • Revenue recycling • Reduction of social security contributions
What are special provisions? • Economic theory: uniform taxes induce efficient reduction of energy use or emissions • Special provisions: deviations from a uniform taxation • Tax differentiation between • energy carriers • users and • usage
Motives for special provisions Fear of adverse effects of taxes • Economic Effects • International competitiveness • Premature retirement of capital (physical, human) • Distributive effects • Principle of “protection of confidence” • Environmental Effects • Carbon leakage: reduction of emissions in one country may be (partially or (over-)compensated by increase of emissions in other countries • Political acceptance
Criteria and constraints for special provisions • Avoid negative economic effects • Avoid carbon leakage • Preserve incentive effect of eco-tax • Legal constraints (national, European, international) • Administrative constraints • Market-based instrument, not discretionary • Conflicting objectives: weighting necessary
Demarcation of beneficiaries • The more precise the demarcation of the beneficiaries, the smaller will be the loss of incentive to reduce emissions and the loss of tax revenue. • However, the necessary administrative procedures would be very complicated, be subject to substantial uncertainties and require ample scope of discretion. • Discretionary special provisions should be kept to a minimum if the idea of environmental taxes as a market-oriented instrument is taken seriously.
Special provisions in Germany • Do not apply to road fuels • Broad and rules-based system: • Tax rates differentiated by energy carriers • Reduced rates for broad-based categories • Firm-specific tax rebates
Germany 1 (draft law - not implemented) • Reduced tax rates of 25% for all producers of the goods and materials sectors • Tax exemption for producers which belong to an “energy-intensive” sector (energy-intensity > 2% • Criticism: • energy intensity inappropriate indicator • statistical categories imply unequal treatment • reduction of net tax burden for energy-intensive activities (perverse incentive effect)
Germany 2 (1999 - 2002) • Reduced tax rates of 20% (of the regular rates) for all producers of the goods and materials sectors • Individual compensation for all tax payments exceeding reduction of pension contributions by more than 20% (tax cap)
Germany 2: Criticism • No perverse incentive effect • Individual firm data and not statistical categories important for tax rebates • Restriction to goods and materials sectors may imply unequal treatment • No incentive to improve energy efficiency for energy-intensive enterprises
Germany 3 • Reduced tax rates of 60% for all producers of the goods and materials sectors • Tax rebates of all 95% of tax payments exceeding the reduction of pension contributions (effective marginal tax rate: 3% of regular rate)
Germany 2 and 3: Comparison • Incentive effect is higher for some enterprises, but lower for others: net effect ambiguous • Average tax burden is higher for most enterprises: positive revenue effect • Danger: revenue raising may dominate environmental objectives
Climate Change Levy • Non-domestic users only • Taxable commodities • Electricity • Natural gas • Coal and lignite • Coke, semi-coke and petroleum coke • LPG • Not taxable commodities • Oil, gas oil, kerosene (subject to excise duties) • Road fuel gas (subject to fuel price escalator) • Heat • Steam
Special provisions in UK • Tax exemptions • Energy supplied in small quantities • Electricity used in electrolysis processes • primary aluminum smelting • chlor-alkali processes • Others: • Electricity from “new” renewables • good quality CHP • Tax reductions: -80% • Energy-intensive sectors (as defined in PPC Regulations) • that are covered by Climate Change Agreements
Some stylised differences Germany • Broad rules-based system with little scope and need for discretionary decisions • Weak incentive effect in industry UK • CCL integrated with CCA and ET from the beginning
Perspectives for Germany • Review for ETR in 2004 • Should Germany continue ETR? • Emissions trading only partial • Tax revenue and labour costs • Exemptions for ET sector? • Reduction of social security contributions • Emission certificates issued for free • Issue does not “go away”