1 / 4

Working Group Breakouts SenseIT PI Meeting October 7, 1999

Working Group Breakouts SenseIT PI Meeting October 7, 1999. Network Data Distribution Interfaces. Members BBNT - McNeil Columbia - Florissi ISI East - Schott/Parker ISI-West - Estrin MIT/LL - Van Hook UCLA - Zhang UCLA - Srivastava Topic

kaya
Download Presentation

Working Group Breakouts SenseIT PI Meeting October 7, 1999

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Working Group BreakoutsSenseIT PI Meeting October 7, 1999

  2. Network Data Distribution Interfaces • Members • BBNT - McNeil • Columbia - Florissi • ISI East - Schott/Parker • ISI-West - Estrin • MIT/LL - Van Hook • UCLA - Zhang • UCLA - Srivastava • Topic • Identify a standard suite of interfaces that supports all the different data distribution schemes, • Develop a plan for defining necessary details • Sketch follow-on responsibilities • Example issues • Information (I.e. queries, detections, etc.) access (read & write) • Communication and other service APIs

  3. FY00 Collaborative Processing • Members • BBNT - Theriault • Marconi - Beck/Reynolds • Sanders - Lang • Sensor.com - Kaiser • VATech - Jones (Display) • Topic • Identify collaborative processing to be implemented in FY00 • Develop a plan for defining necessary details • Sketch follow-on responsibilities • Scheme should • Be applicable to proposed FY00 scenario • Demonstrate basic collaboration benefits • Be implementable in the relatively short FY00 timeframe.

  4. Node Functionality Management • Members • BBNT - Owen • Cornell - Bonnet • NAI - Balenson • PSU - Brooks/Carmen • Rockwell - Agre • UMD - Davis • Topic • Outline required functionality of node “Function Manager” • e.g. mobile code management, task request arbitration, conditional task change control, re-tasking implementation, etc. • Sketch Function Management architecture that supports this functionality and allows assigning organizational responsibility • Develop plan for resolving remaining details • Propose organizational responsibilities

More Related