1 / 21

No Child Left Behind

No Child Left Behind. California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003. Adequate Yearly Progress. Basics of AYP Components of AYP Reporting Timeline. Adequate Yearly Progress The Basics. Based on English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics separately

kiraj
Download Presentation

No Child Left Behind

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress(AYP) July 2003

  2. Adequate Yearly Progress • Basics of AYP • Components of AYP • Reporting Timeline

  3. Adequate Yearly ProgressThe Basics • Based on English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics separately • All students held to same high academic standards • Goal: 100% proficiency by 2013-14

  4. Adequate Yearly ProgressComponents • Achievement of ELA and math Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs): percent proficient or above • 95% participation rate • API for all schools • Graduation rate for high schools

  5. A Y P AMOs in ELA and Math 95% Participation Rate API Graduation rate

  6. Goals & Annual Measurable ObjectivesApply to All • Schools (including alternative and charter schools) • Districts • Numerically significant student subgroups within schools and districts (ethnic, socioeconomically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities)

  7. Elementary and Middle Schools California Standards Tests (CSTs) in ELA and Math California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

  8. High Schools Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

  9. English-Language Arts Proficient or above = 387 or above Not Proficient = Below 387 CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB(High Schools Only) NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.

  10. Math Proficient or above = 373 or above Not Proficient = Below 373 CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB(High Schools Only) NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.

  11. Different AMOs • Elementary schools, middle schools, and elementary school districts • High schools and high school districts with grades 9-12 • Unified districts and high school districts with grades 7 and/or 8 (based on a rounded average of #1 and #2 above)

  12. 2003 AMOs for Schools

  13. 2003 AMOs for Districts

  14. AMOsEnglish-language artsElementary and Middle Schools Elementary Districts

  15. Participation Rates • 95% required on any assessment used for AYP under NCLB. • The remaining 5% is the maximum allowable percentage of non-participants, including students who are exempted from testing at parental request.

  16. Additional Indicators • The API as the “other” indicator for all grades • API above the “status bar,” OR • Show growth of at least one point • Graduation rate an additional indicator for high schools only • Demonstrate a one-tenth of a percent increase up to 100%

  17. The API ‘Status Bar’

  18. Graduation Rate National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) four-year completion rate. Progress Increase of one-tenth of one percent per year until the school reaches 100%

  19. 2003 Reporting Timeline 2003 Growth API Report 2002 Base AYP Report 2003 AYP Report 2003 Final AYP Report July 22 December August 15 November October September

  20. 2002 AYP Base Report • Starting points for each school and district. • CDE will post on the Internet on July 22, 2003. • Districts and schools may determine whether they are at risk for not meeting AYP criteria when the 2003 report is released in August.

  21. 2003 AYP Reports • CDE will post 2003 AYP reports on the Internet on August 15, 2003. • Reports will include the “percent proficient” and participation rates based on 2003 testing data. • Will be used to identify districts and schools that are not making AYP for 2003.

More Related