1 / 39

Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08

Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08. Annual Report and Public Hearing Midland ISD January 13, 2009. Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS). Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute Published annually since 1990-91 Gives parents and community a snapshot of

kyleigh-dallaher
Download Presentation

Academic Excellence Indicator System 2007-08

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Academic Excellence Indicator System2007-08 Annual Report and Public Hearing Midland ISD January 13, 2009

  2. Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) • Comprehensive reporting system defined by statute • Published annually since 1990-91 • Gives parents and community a snapshot of • District/Campus Performance (Section I of AEIS Report) • District/Campus Profile (Section II of AEIS Report) • Contains all data used to determine District/Campus accountability ratings • Uses data collected through: • State data reporting system (PEIMS) • Student assessment system

  3. AEIS Reports(Overview – Three Sections) Cover Page District Performance District Profile

  4. AEIS Reports(Cover Page) • District 2008 Accountability Rating: • Academically Acceptable • District PBM Special Education Monitoring Results: • Local Interventions Implemented • Each status is explained in detail in Appendix G to the 2007-08 AEIS Glossary (p. 57) • District 2008 Gold Performance Acknowledgments: • None applicable at the district level • 52 received at the campuses -- an increase of 6

  5. AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards ** Recognized Standard • In the 2007 Accountability Manual, the Commissioner proposed that the Recognized standard increase to 80% in 2009 • It will remain at 75% in 2009, but is scheduled to go to 80% in 2010 (subject to review in 2009) * TAKS-Accommodated (Group 1) • Science (Grades 5, 8, 10, 11); Spanish (5) • Social Studies (Grades 8, 10, 11) • ELA (Grade 11) • Math (Grade 11)

  6. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • TAKS performance – Spring 2008 (p. 1 – 5) • “Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group • Divided by English and Spanish Test Takers • Comparison to 2007 performance • Comparison to State and Region performance

  7. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • TAKS performance – Spring 2008 AccountabilityMeasure: “Met Standard” – Sum of All Grades Tested (3-11 or all grades tested at campus) • By subject • Reading/ELA, Math, Writing, Science, Social Studies • By student group • All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged

  8. 2008 TAKS Performance Sum of All Grades Tested 2008 Accountability Indicator

  9. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • TAKS Met 2010 Standard – Preview (p. 5) • 2010 preview at Panel Recommendation • “Met Standard” by grade, subject, and student group • Additional TAKS (Accommodated) subjects/grades • Reading and Math 3-10 • Writing 4, 7 • Comparison to State and Region performance

  10. TAKS Met 2009 StandardSum of All Grades Tested 2010 Accountability Indicator Preview

  11. AEIS ReportsCommended Performance • Achieved Commended Performance (p. 5) • ~90% of the items correct; Scale score of 2400

  12. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • TAKS/TAKS-Acc/TAKS-M/TAKS-Alt Participation (p. 6) • Sum of all grades by student group • TAKS Exit-Level Cumulative Pass Rate (p. 6) • Progress of Prior Year TAKS Failers (p. 7) • TGI (Texas Growth Index) (p. 7 and p. 33 Glossary) • Student Success Initiative Results (p. 7-9) • English Language Learners Progress Measure (not shown this year) • Scheduled future accountability indicator

  13. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • Attendance Rate (p. 9) • Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9) • Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure] • Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Grades 9-12 • Completion Rate II (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Completion Rate I (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard Accountability Measure]

  14. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • Attendance Rate (p. 9) • Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9) • Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure] • Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Grades 9-12 • Completion Rate II (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Completion Rate I (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard Accountability Measure]

  15. AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards • Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-8) (p. 9) • Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (school year of dropout in parentheses)

  16. 2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-8)

  17. AEIS Key Issues for 2007-08 • Implementation of NCES definition of dropout impacted the following accountability indicators in 2006-07: • Grade 7-8 dropout rate [Standard Accountability Measure] • Grade 7-12 dropout rate [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Completion Rate I [Standard Accountability Measure] • Completion Rate II [Alternative Accountability Measure] • School Leaver Provision for 2007-08 • Dropout rate or completion rate cannot be the cause of a lowered district/campus rating

  18. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • Attendance Rate (p. 9) • Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9) • Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure] • Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Grades 9-12 • Completion Rate II (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Completion Rate I (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard Accountability Measure]

  19. 2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 7-12)(2008 Alternative Education Accountability Indicator)

  20. AEIS Reports(Section I - Performance) • District performance indicators include: • Attendance Rate (p. 9) • Annual Dropout Rate (2006-07) (p. 9) • Grades 7-8 [Standard Accountability Measure] • Grades 7-12 [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Grades 9-12 • Completion Rate II (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (with GED) [Alternative Accountability Measure] • Completion Rate I (p. 10) • Class of 2007 (without GED) [Standard Accountability Measure]

  21. 2006-07 Annual Dropout Rate (Gr. 9-12)(Report Only)

  22. AEIS: 2008 Accountability Standards • Completion Rate (HS)(p. 10) • Grades 9-12 (2003-04 Freshman Class) • Final Decision: Standards by Accountability Year (freshman year of cohort in parentheses)

  23. Completion Rate I(2008 Accountability Indicator) (p. 10) • Percent of students (longitudinal measure) who first attended 9th grade in 2003-04 who graduated or who are continuing their education 4 years later: • Graduated with class of 2007 (or earlier) • Re-enrolled in school in fall of 2007

  24. Completion Rate IClass of 2007 (Longitudinal) State=78%

  25. Violent and Criminal Incidents • Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district • Number • Rate • Type • No conduct reported punishable as a felony

  26. Violent and Criminal Incidents

  27. AEIS ReportsCollege Readiness Indicators • District performance indicators include: • Advanced Courses/Dual Enrollment (p. 10) • Recommended High School Program (RHSP)/Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) Graduates (p. 10) • AP/IB Results (p. 10) • Texas Success Initiative – Higher Education Readiness Component (HERC) (p. 10) • SAT/ACT Results (p. 11) • College-Ready Graduates (Class of 2007) (p. 11) • Scheduled future accountability indicator

  28. Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators • 19.3% of high school students completing an Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment –increase by 0.2% over prior year (p.10) • 73.1% of 2007 graduates completing the RHSP/DAP – an increase by 2.7% from last year (p.10) • 7.4% of AP students tested on at least one AP exam – increase of 2.4% over prior year examination results (p. 10) • 38.8% of SAT/ACT scores at or above criterion – increase of 1.6% over prior year

  29. Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators • Texas Success Initiative (TSI) • HERC – Higher Education Readiness Component • Measures Math and ELA proficiency • ≥2200 on both + 3 on writing • Includes TAKS-Accommodated

  30. Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS: ELA)

  31. Additional Indicators(2008 11th Graders Meeting HERC vs. Passing TAKS: Math)

  32. Additional Indicators:College Readiness Indicators • College-Ready Graduates • High school graduates who: • Met HERC standard on Exit Level ELA/Math; OR • Scored >=500 on SAT Reading/Math and >=1070 Total; OR • Scored >= 19 on ACT English/Math and >=23 Composite

  33. Additional Indicators2007 College-Ready Graduates ELA & Math State = 49% ELA State = 56% Math

  34. Tested: All Students: 51.2% Af. Amer.: 52.2% Hispanic: 23.6% White: 64.6% Eco. Dis.: n/a At/Above Criterion All Students: 38.8% Af. Amer.: 11.4% Hispanic: 19.0% White: 44.3% Eco. Dis.: n/a Additional IndicatorsSAT/ACT Results (p. 11)

  35. Student Enrollment and Academic Performance (Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board) • Data collected and reported by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board • Reported for each high school in the district • Reports on student performance in postsecondary institutions • Most recent report (2005-06) available at: • http://www.txhighereddata.org/Interactive/HSCollLink.cfm

  36. AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile) (p. 1-2) • Student Information • By grade • Ethnicity • Program areas • Graduates • Retention rates • Class size

  37. AEIS Reports(Section II - Profile) • Staff Information (p. 3-4) • Professional staff • Educational aides/auxiliary staff • Ethnicity and gender • Degrees held • Experience • Average teacher salary • Turnover rate for teachers • Financial Information (p. 5-6) • Tax information • Revenues • Expenditures

  38. Campus Performance Objectives • Campus Improvement Plans are based on the AEIS (available online on campus webpages) • Performance Objectives are approved by the Board of Trustees (February Meeting) • Data from the AEIS gives direction for the development of performance objectives that are low in relation to the accountability standards

  39. Accessing the AEIS Report • Public Hearing • January 13, 2009 – Board Meeting • Campuses schedule their own meetings • Where the report is available • TEA website • District website • Campus libraries or offices

More Related