1 / 24

Hanley Road Corridor Study

Hanley Road Corridor Study. A Corridor Approach to Traffic Impact Studies. Presentation to: TEAM Given By: Stephanie Leon Streeter, P.E. September 20, 2005. Project History. Steering Committee formed in 2002 St. Louis County – City of Brentwood

liang
Download Presentation

Hanley Road Corridor Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hanley Road Corridor Study A Corridor Approach to Traffic Impact Studies Presentation to: TEAM Given By: Stephanie Leon Streeter, P.E. September 20, 2005

  2. Project History • Steering Committee formed in 2002 • St. Louis County – City of Brentwood • City of Maplewood – City of Richmond Heights • Notice to Proceed given to PB June 2003 • Partnership funded study • St. Louis County • The 3 Cities • 7 Stakeholder groups

  3. Stakeholder Involvement • Major landowners and developers • Dierberg’s Markets • Pace Properties, Inc. • THF Realty, Inc • Sunnen Products Company • KV Pharmaceutical • DCM • MoDOT, Metro and EWGCOG

  4. Study Area and Developments I-64 I-170

  5. Mission Statement The Hanley Road Corridor Steering Committee will provide a transportation corridor from I-64 to Laclede Station Road that addresses current and future transportation needs of the local and regional community, supporting economic growth, minimizing residential impacts and enhancing the quality of life in the cities of Brentwood, Maplewood, Richmond Heights, and St. Louis County.

  6. Decision Making Structure

  7. Study Objectives • The improvement of circulation around and in the study area • The development of alternative concepts to address problems related to congestion • A consistent streetscape • The safe movement of peds and vehicles

  8. Project Goals • To develop alternatives that can move easily into the design phase by completion of the study • To achieve a LOS of D at signalized intersections with our alternatives • To develop creative alternatives to address access and capacity issues

  9. Project Goals continued… • To provide safe pedestrian access across and along the corridor as best possible • To improve the streetscape of Hanley Road • To improve vehicular access to the corridor

  10. Hanley Road Background

  11. Traffic Analysis - Existing Conditions North Area South Area

  12. Initial Alternatives Developed • I-64/Eager/Dale Area • N1 - Geometric Improvements I • N2 - Geometric Improvements II • N3 - Tunnel to WB Eager • N4 - Tunnel between Eager/Hanley • N5 - Revised Geometric Improvements • N6 - Realign Eager and Dale • N7 - Combination of N3 and N5 • N8 - Relocate Eager under Hanley, connect Eager to Dale

  13. Initial Alternatives Developed • Manchester Road Area • S1 - Manchester Road at-grade with dual left-turns in all directions • S2 - Hanley Road over Manchester Road with urban single-point interchange

  14. Initial Screening – Eager/Dale Area Legend l Poor (i.e. poor capacity, high cost) 8 Moderate/Average m Good (i.e. good capacity, low cost)

  15. Intersection LOS (South Area)

  16. Intersection LOS (North Area) * Note that significant improvement to the WB off-ramp was not practical prior to I-64 improvements..

  17. Preferred Concept – North Total Cost: $22 M

  18. Preferred Concept – South Total Cost: $32 M

  19. Improvement Costs: • Design: $3.4 million (that will be offset by using in-house forces) • R/W: $13 million—estimate • Construction: $38 million Total: $54 million

  20. Next Steps • Conclude Study • Spring 2004 • Access Justification Report • Concept approval from FHWA • Establish Funding • $$ Transportation Development District (TDD) • $$ MoDOT Cost-Sharing • $$ Local/Federal Dollars • $$ Other

  21. Next Steps Cont’d • Preliminary/Final Design • Environmental Document • Land Acquisition • Construction

  22. Funding Mechanisms • Federal Earmark in Highway Bill • $8M • Regional Transportation Development District (TDD) • Estimate $10M in revenue • MoDOT Cost-Sharing Program • Estimate $16M in revenue • MTFC loan • $25M • STP funds • Future Developer Improvements

  23. Current Status • St. Louis County In-House Design (Dan Dreisewerd Project Manager) • Additional Funding Sought for Construction

  24. Questions and Discussion

More Related