90 likes | 180 Views
Muon Spectrometer Upgrade. Physics Motivation. o W-physics: Increase the rejection of the single muon trigger to 10 4 (design: 10 3 , observed: 10 2 ). o Gluon saturation at small x in d-Au: Extension of the kinematic range for direct photon production to small x.
E N D
Muon Spectrometer Upgrade Physics Motivation o W-physics: Increase the rejection of the single muon trigger to 104 (design: 103, observed: 102). o Gluon saturation at small x in d-Au: Extension of the kinematic range for direct photon production to small x. o first level trigger for Heavy Ion Physics o Increase stability of muon trigger against beam related backgrounds. Components of the upgrade Front electronics and trigger People and Schedule Matthias Grosse Perdekamp, RBRC and UIUC
Physics Motivation W Production in pp Level 1 trigger in AA Gluon Saturation in dA Measure the A-dependence of the gluon distribution at small x: o Survey the dependence of nucleon structure on the nuclear environment. o Search for gluon saturation at small x: 10-3<x<10-2 o Survey initial state for HI high pT physics. Study color screening effects associated with QGP production in quarkonium states: The seperation of the (1S) state from the (2S) and (3S) states requires good invariant mass resolution (100MeV) and requires long runs at as high as possible integrated luminosity.
Projected Rates in pp: Level 1 Channel Rates electron trigger 4kHz (EMCxRICH, E>1.5GeV) R=3000 photon trigger (EMC>3GeV) 0.3kHz R=40000 Jet (EMC Multiplicity) 6kHz single muon 17.6kHz (muId deep muon) R=570 Others 2kHz Total 29.9kHz PHENIX bandwidth 12kHz (->24kHz for $2M) o rate from level 1 should stay below about 7-8kHz o can pre-scale electron trigger and jet trigger by factors 2-3 (as event samples are going to be several 106 events). o W sample is about 104. o Maschine Luminosity will increase over several years (first 500 GeV production run: Time scale to fix the trigger problem is 3-5 years. o Ken Reed et.al and Jamie Nagle et al. found “default R(uId)” of about 1000. o We do not have a reliable estimate of beam related background in the muon trigger. o need additional rejection of 10-50 depending on the beam background trigger rate.
Upgrade Components: Pad Chamber II Muon from hadron decays Jet vs W Muon from W Nosecone Calorimeter Pad Chamber I Hodoscope I Hodoscope II Cerenkov Nosecone calorimeter -> dA: low x, pp: W-tag, b-tag Pad Chambers+uID -> high momentum lepton and di-lepton trigger for pp, AA hodoscopes+uID -> pp: W-tag Cerenkov+uID -> AA: trigger, beam gas rejection pp: W-tag Muons from hadrons Muons from Ws pmuon
Pad Chamber: Amp/Disc Cathode plane 360 azimuthal strips made as an digital .OR. of individual pads .OR. 2 mm pitch proportional wire chamber for gain amplification
Example: Single Muon Trigger Rejection Level 1 Tracking: Hodoscope + muID Road Level 1 Threshold: Cerenkov + muID Road raw decay muons raw decay muons with muID lvl1 with muID lvl1 with tracking with Cerenkov Rejection: 3.7 Rejection: 36 Pythia and PISA simulation by Greg ver Steeg and Jennifer Hom
Example: N-EMC, kinematic coverage More than 100 events in bin width logx=0.1 More than 103 events in bin width logx=0.1 More than 104 events in bin width logx=0.1 More than 105 events in bin width logx=0.1 Pythia simulation by Rich Seto
Channel Counts for one Muon Arm Timing Pattern Pulse Height
(1) Time Schedule : a) first 500 GeV run in 2005: (low luminosity) b) max. Luminosity in 2006 or 2007 (2) Menu of possible upgrades: a) new LL1/L1.5 electronics b) two tracking hodoscopes c) two pad chambers d) segmented nosecone calorimeter e) Cherenkov (3) Interested groups: o RBRC (Brendan, Abhay) o Kyoto (Naohito) o RIKEN (Atsushi) o Columbia (Chi) o UCR (Ken, Rich, Wei) o UIUC ( JCP, MGP) o Iowa (John Lajoie) o UNM (Doug) (4) Funding: a) RIKEN/RBRC b) Kyoto (requested R&D funding) c) UIUC ($200k) d) NSF MRI grant: Consortium of UIUC and UCR University : December NSF : December/January Plans: