150 likes | 343 Views
Mn-doped Ga(As,P) and (Al,Ga)As ferromagnetic semiconductors J.Mašek, J. Kudrnovský, F.Máca, T.Jungwirth, Jairo Sinova, A.H.MacDonald. Outline. Motivation Enhanced Curie temperature in mixed hosts Defects: substitutional vs. interstitial Mn in the Ga(As,P) and (Al,Ga)As Summary. Motivation.
E N D
Mn-doped Ga(As,P) and (Al,Ga)As ferromagnetic semiconductorsJ.Mašek, J. Kudrnovský, F.Máca, T.Jungwirth,Jairo Sinova, A.H.MacDonald FZU 7.11.2006
Outline • Motivation • Enhanced Curie temperature in mixed hosts • Defects: substitutional vs. interstitial Mn in the Ga(As,P) and (Al,Ga)As • Summary FZU 7.11.2006
Motivation • Wider bandgap than in GaAs Mn d- states closer to the valence band edge • Mn acceptor level deeper in VB and more localized extend of exchange coupling • Smaller lattice constant of GaP enhanced p-d hybridization FZU 7.11.2006
III-V family: Internal reference rule FZU 7.11.2006
Lattice constant: Vegard’s law FZU 7.11.2006
Tight-binding model FZU 7.11.2006
Tight-binding model – cont. FZU 7.11.2006
Tight-binding model – cont. FZU 7.11.2006
TC: LDA+U calculations mean-field calculations for 5% and 10% Mn FZU 7.11.2006
Range of exchange coupling FZU 7.11.2006
Mn interstitials: formation energies • Formation energies Es,i (xs,xi) of MnGa and MnI as functions of partial concentrations xs and xi . • Balanced state: Es(xs,xi) = Ei(xs,xi) . FZU 7.11.2006
Ga(As,P): MnGa vs MnI FZU 7.11.2006
(Al,Ga)As: MnGa , MnAl vs. MnI FZU 7.11.2006
Substitutional vs.interstitial Mn FZU 7.11.2006
Summary • Strength of p-d hybridization is more important for TC high than band structure effect • The range of exchange coupling in (Ga,Mn)(As,P) unchanged for less than 50% P • Suppressed formation of MnI in (Ga,Mn)(As,P) • Remarkable increase of TC in (Ga,Mn)(As,P) • No improvement expected in (Al,Ga,Mn)As • Preferential formation of MnI in (Al,Ga)As FZU 7.11.2006