1 / 11

Outline

Outline. Introduction LOM Application Profiles The ELENA Smart Space for Learning A LOM Application Profile for a Smart Space for Learning Conclusions. Introduction. What do we aim? Overcome present lack of interoperability between learning repositories.

qiana
Download Presentation

Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outline • Introduction • LOM Application Profiles • The ELENA Smart Space for Learning • A LOM Application Profile for a Smart Space for Learning • Conclusions

  2. Introduction • What do we aim? • Overcome present lack of interoperability between learning repositories.

  3. Application profiles and ontologies • LOM Well known standard • App. ProfileAdaptation or combination of schemas • LOM+AP Good starting point to interoperate

  4. What makes a LOM application profile? • Selects LOM elements • Specifies value restrictions • Refines LOM semantics • Specifies multiplicity constraints • Introduces required extensions • Refines the learning object notion • Possibly aim backwards compatibility

  5. The Need for Interoperability in Smart Spaces for Learning • LOMAP initiated by Elena and extended by ProLearn. • Elena’s Smart Space for Learning: • Network of learning repositories, which supports the personalized mediation of heterogeneous learning objects. • Corporate learners are being offered heterogeneous set of learning objects. • Shortcomings in decision effectiveness, process administration, IT infrastructure. • Need for a global view of integrated internal and external repositories. • Search based on an ontology or common data model shared by several systems.

  6. Differentiating Learning Material from Learning Activity • LM: Consumed independently of time and location. Physical or digital good. • LA: Live events. Synchronous service. • IMS LD and SCORM already use this concept. • Here an LA is an autonomous entity. • The AP is conditioned by the selection criteria and the results description.

  7. Application Profile Design • Refinement of the Learning Object Notion • Distinguish two types of learning objects and be expressive enough for contractual purposes. • Selection of LOM elements • Mainly for learning material. • Specification of value restrictions • For LOM value spaces and vCard elements. • Semantics refinement • To apply it in the Smart Space for Learning. • Specification of multiplicity constraints • Also for each vocabulary entry. • Introduction of extensions • Both in vocabulary and elements.

  8. Overview of Selected Elements and Mappings • Categories (LOM, Profile): • Rights • General • Metametadata • Technical • Classification • Lifecycle • Educational • Relation and annotation • Mappings to Dublin Core and Open-Qcat. Brokerage aspects Identification LM technical aspects Versatility LA concepts LO classification Notused

  9. Conclusion • LOM Application Profile for building Smart Spaces of Learning. • Generic process for designing LOM Application Profiles. • Distinction between Learning Material and Learning Activities. • Learning objects described for brokerage purposes.

More Related