280 likes | 487 Views
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning. Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!. United States Department of Education Early Literacy First Grant. Focus : Pre-K 3 and 4 year olds Purpose : Create early childhood centers of excellence
E N D
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRSTWhat We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
United States Department of Education Early Literacy First Grant • Focus: Pre-K 3 and 4 year olds • Purpose: • Create early childhood centers of excellence • Prepare young children to enter kindergarten with necessary skills to ensure school success
Oklahoma ERF • Sooner T.A.L.K • Oklahoma P.R.I.D.E. • Starting Right
GOALS • Create language and literacy rich classroom environments • Integrate curriculum, activities and materials into classrooms and family literacy practices • Assess literacy learning • Build partnerships to support the transition of all children into formal classroom instruction • Support family literacy • Provide research-based sustained professional development
COMPONENTS • Professional Development • Instruction • Child Assessment/Progress Monitoring • Literacy Mentors • Family Literacy Component • Family Literacy Nights • Family Literacy Resources • Home Visits • Project Evaluation
Project Development • Year One • Physical transformation of classrooms • Initiate literacy classes • Learn to mentor • Year Two • Implement spiral curriculum of literacy classes • Learn to develop portfolios • Year Three • Focus on examining student work to plan instruction
Three C’s of Professional Development • Community • Professional development classes • Examine student learning • Curriculum Content: Assessment and Instruction of Oklahoma ERF Benchmarks • Oral language • Phonological awareness • Print concepts • Alphabet knowledge and writing • Listening comprehension • Coaching • Implementing instructional strategies
Structure of Professional Development Classes • Two groups: certified and non-certified teachers • Classes off campus • Classes two times each month for 3 hours • Literacy instructor • Literacy mentors attend
OBSERVATION PLANNING REFLECTION STAFF DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTION The Continuous, Recursive, and Interactive Process of Progress Monitoring
Oklahoma P.R.I.D.E. Progress-Monitoring Plan
Project Evaluation • Classrooms • Before and after photos • Teachers • Concept Maps • ELLCO: Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation • Focus Groups • Students • TELD: Test of Early Language Development • PALS: Phonological Assessment Literacy Screening • Parents • Literacy Activities Survey
Setting up Centers Dramatic Play Writing Library
Concept Maps Early Literacy
Concept Maps • Voltz, 2004 (Action in Teacher Education, v. 27 # 3) • Rated maps for variation and quantity • Variation = number of categories represented in the map • Quantity = total number of ideas
Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation • Literacy Environment Checklist • Book Use and Availability - 20 points • Writing Materials and Display – 21 points • Classroom Observation Protocol • General Classroom Environment – 30 points • Language and Literacy Curriculum – 40 points • Literacy Activity Rating Scale • Book reading – 8 points • Writing – 5 points
Focus Groups • Accomplishments • Professional growth • Focus of the program on their roles as professionals – before the program Pre-K teachers were “considered by some to be babysitters but now they were using research-based teaching principles that can be measured and validated” • Provided roadmap for meeting state standards
Benefits • Access to resources/research-based, developmentally appropriate instructional strategies • Mentor support • Professional development classes • Progress of children • Credit towards CDA • Interact with other teachers • Peer support • Opportunity to attend professional conferences
Challenges/Concerns • Letting go of old curriculum and ways • Over-emphasizing literacy • Leaving their assistant alone with their class in order to attend professional development classes • Having resources to sustain parent activity component after the ERF grant ends • More modeling of different types of classroom instruction by their mentor
TELD • TELD: Test of Early Language Development • Administered in English only • Not normed on our population • Assesses English language learning children need for initial success in school
PALS/AMIGOS • Rhyme Awareness • Beginning Sound • Upper-Case Alphabet • Lower-Case Alphabet • Verbal memory • Print Knowledge • Concept of Word • Name Writing
PALS/AMIGOS Results • All scores for both groups (PRIDE and Comparison) were significantly different from pre-test to post-test. • There was a statistically significant difference between groups on rhyme awareness.
What Have We Learned • Childcare research is very messy. • It has taken three years to see differences in child outcomes. • Mentoring has to be learned. • Early childhood educators with a strong literacy background are difficult to find. • There is a tension among early childhood and literacy educators over DAP and purposeful instruction.
Thank you for attending this presentation.Questions? pgriffith@ou.edu