1 / 31

2009-2010 Update to Perkins IV Local 5-Year Plan Local Improvement Plan Annual Application

2009-2010 Update to Perkins IV Local 5-Year Plan Local Improvement Plan Annual Application. April 30, 2009. Changes Happen. Feedback about the structure Too complicated Confusing Results did not reflect the great work that we know is happening We need to tell our story

temira
Download Presentation

2009-2010 Update to Perkins IV Local 5-Year Plan Local Improvement Plan Annual Application

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009-2010 Update to Perkins IV Local 5-Year Plan Local Improvement Plan Annual Application April 30, 2009 Oregon Department of Education 2009

  2. Changes Happen • Feedback about the structure • Too complicated • Confusing • Results did not reflect the great work that we know is happening • We need to tell our story • Gather models of effective practices • Federal accountability has increased • Identify technical assistance & professional development needs Oregon Department of Education 2009

  3. Are we asking for too much? • Everything we’re asking for now is based on what we asked for in the 5-year plans! • There are no new expectations • Improvement planning is required • Not having an improvement planning process is an unsupportable position • It is no longer assumed, it must be explicit Oregon Department of Education 2009

  4. Update-at-a-Glance • Introduction • A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan • Program Design Performance • Standards and Content • Alignment and Articulation • Accountability and Evaluation • Student Performance/Local Improvement Plan • Student Support Services • Professional Development • B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium Funds • C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund • R1. Technical Skill Assessments • R2. Professional Development • D. Improvement Planning Process • Appendices Oregon Department of Education 2009

  5. Introduction Overview RESPONSE REQUIRED Oregon Department of Education 2009

  6. Update-at-a-Glance • A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan • Program Design Performance • Standards and Content • Alignment and Articulation • Accountability and Evaluation • Student Performance/Local Improvement Plan • Student Support Services • Professional Development • B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium Funds • C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund R1. Technical Skill Assessments R2. Professional Development • D. Improvement Planning Process Oregon Department of Education 2009

  7. Update-at-a-Glance • A. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan • B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium Funds • C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund • D. Improvement Planning Process Oregon Department of Education 2009

  8. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan(2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan) By 2012-2013: • 100% of Perkins-eligible programs of study align with Oregon Skill Sets [Oregon Skill Sets] or other industry-based standards; • 95% of Perkins-eligible programs of study use relevant technology that directly supports increasing student academic knowledge and technical skill attainment. Oregon Department of Education 2009

  9. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan) Please respond with an explicit description of activities to be planned and implemented that will lead toward the attainment of each indicator for this benchmark. Describe what evidence or documentation [progress markers] you will gather to indicate progress toward meeting the 2012-2013 level. Oregon Department of Education 2009

  10. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan) • Explicit description of activities to be planned and implemented • Describe what evidence or documentation [progress markers] you will gather to indicate progress Oregon Department of Education 2009

  11. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan(2008-2013 Local 5-Year Plan) Oregon Department of Education 2009

  12. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan(2009-2010 Update) • Overview and Measurement Process Narrative • Short term Narrative Plan for 2009-2010 • Long term Narrative Plan for 2010-2013 Oregon Department of Education 2009

  13. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) • Overview and Measurement Process Narrative • What is the context (overview) for this goal? • Include rationale, strategies, and activities that you plan to use to increase performance. • How will you measure progress? (What process will you use?) Oregon Department of Education 2009

  14. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) • Short term Narrative Plan for 2009-2010 • What will you do to improve the program? Strategies, Activities, etc. • Long term Narrative Plan for 2010-2013 • Brief descriptions of how the activities in 09-10 affect your long term plan • What adjustments are necessary? Oregon Department of Education 2009

  15. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) • Goal 3c Action Plan • An Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan is required for each Performance Measure that does not meet the 90% threshold.  Oregon Department of Education 2009

  16. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) • Goal 3c Action Plan • It is highly recommended that an Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan be included for goals that do not meet the current performance target. Recipients should plan strategies/activities to meet increased performance levels in the future.   Oregon Department of Education 2009

  17. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) • Goal 3c Action Plan • If all Performance Measures have been met, identify those Performance Measures that will be used to focus your work and expenditures for next year; include a complete Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan for each of those goals. Oregon Department of Education 2009

  18. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) Oregon Department of Education 2009

  19. Local or Consortium Basic Grant Plan (2009-2010 Update) Long term Narrative Plan for 2010-2013 Oregon Department of Education 2009

  20. B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium Funds • Describe: • How the regional eligible recipient for the consortium will distribute Perkins IV funds • Include • The rationale for such allocation • Attach • A signed copy (all members) of the consortium’s operational agreement • The job descriptions of staff supported by Perkins funded consortium dollars. Oregon Department of Education 2009

  21. B. Plan and Distribution of Perkins IV Consortium Funds Oregon Department of Education 2009

  22. C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund • Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan for each of the goals • A one-year plan • An expectation and a requirement that plans reflect coherent planning that leads toward meeting the 2012-2013 performance goals • For activities beyond those outlined in the 2009-2010 Local Plan Update Oregon Department of Education 2009

  23. C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund • Explain how you measure your progress and performance for this goal • Describe how you will use the Regional Reserve Funds for activities beyond those outlined in your 2009-2010 Local Plan Update, and the ‘value added’ that those activities will provide Oregon Department of Education 2009

  24. C. Plan for Regional Reserve Fund 2009-2010 Action Plan for Regional Reserve Funds Oregon Department of Education 2009

  25. D. Improvement Planning Process Oregon Department of Education 2009

  26. D. Improvement Planning Process Describe the different people/groups you consulted, and how you worked with them Oregon Department of Education 2009

  27. D. Improvement Planning Process • Describe the process you used to: • Identify your priority needs • Develop your yearly goals • Decide what strategies/activities you would adopt Oregon Department of Education 2009

  28. D. Improvement Planning Process • Describe the process you used to develop your: • Action Plan/Local Improvement Plan • Monitoring plan • Evaluation plan Oregon Department of Education 2009

  29. D. Improvement Planning Process • If you cannot complete the above information: • Explain why you could not complete the above information • Explain how decisions were made concerning the distribution of federal Perkins funds • Describe how you will implement an improvement planning process next year Oregon Department of Education 2009

  30. What Do We Expect? A summary of the overall planning process NOT Detailed planning processes for each goal The actual planning process used (REALLY!!!) A commitment to improving the process Oregon Department of Education 2009

  31. Thank You! Oregon Department of Education 2009

More Related