280 likes | 646 Views
Conflict and Change. Bolman and Deal, 2003 DiPoala , 2009 Fullan , 2001. Objective: Explore the relationship between leadership, change, and conflict. Is conflict intrinsically bad? . Why or why not?. Organizational Frames.
E N D
Conflict and Change Bolman and Deal, 2003 DiPoala, 2009 Fullan, 2001
Objective: Explore the relationship between leadership, change, and conflict
Is conflict intrinsically bad? Why or why not?
Organizational Frames • Structural (Sociology): Emphasis on goals, specialized roles, and formal relationships marked by formal rules, policies, and procedures (Division of Labor Approach) Taylor and Weber • Human Resource (Psychology ): Organizations are extended families made up of individuals, with needs, feelings, prejudices, and limitations. • Political (Political Science): Organizations as arenas, contests, or jungles. Interests compete for power and resources (Machiavellian) • Symbolic (Social and Cultural Anthropology): Organizations as tribes, theaters, or carnivals propelled by rituals, ceremonies, stories, heroes, and myths
Structural Frame • Conflict undermines effectiveness (Frederick Taylor and Max Weber) • Hierarchical conflict • Partisan groups • Approach to Conflict: Maintain organizational goals by having authorities resolve conflict
Political Frame Scarce resources and enduring differences make conflict central and power the most important asset (pg. 187) • Competition for resources, jobs, title, and prestige • Conflict is natural and inevitable • Occurs at boundaries of groups and/or units (Vertical/Horizontal) • Cultural conflict: Values, Beliefs, and Lifestyles • Focus on strategy and tactics, not elimination of conflict • Costs and benefits (Tranquil, harmonious organizations) • Status Quo – New ideas, innovation • Situation dependent – increase or decrease conflict • Handling conflict: Poor=chaos, Well=innovation • Leadership role: Recognize and use organizational conflict productively
Human Resource Frame • Linear relationship between hierarchy and level of conflict • Approaching Conflict: Develop relationships by having individuals confront conflict • “Oil on troubled waters” approach • Develop skills – conflict management, listening, consensus building • Agree on the basics • Differences are a group responsibility - leadership
Symbolic Frame • Conflict is absorbed through: • Fraternity • Distributive Leadership • Diversity as competitive advantage • Stories and Myths • Humor and Play • Approach Conflict: Develop shared values and use conflict to negotiate meaning
Conflict-Management Style • Avoiding Style: Administrator ignores conflict hoping it will go away. Drawn-out procedures are used to stifle conflict • Compromising Style: Individual and organizational needs are balanced. Negotiation, middle-ground, and tradeoffs • Accommodating Style: Give in to the demands of the subordinates. • Collaborating Style: Problems and conflicts are seen as challenges. Differences are confronted and information/ideas are shared (Hoy and Miskel, 2005)
Conflict Management Styles Uncooperative Cooperative Assertive Unassertive (Hoy and Miskel, 2005, pg. 232)
Organizational Conflict Conflict Amanson, 1996
Conflict Theory Amanson, 1996
Questions • What is the relationship between change and conflict? • What is the relationship between leadership and change? • What is your conflict management style? • What are some leadership challenges in keeping conflict in the affective?