1 / 47

2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review

2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review. DSTP and AYP Review. Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends AYP Status for Appoquinimink Schools Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus. 2010 DSTP Results. Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends.

asasia
Download Presentation

2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2009/2010 DSTP/AYP Review

  2. DSTP and AYP Review • Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends • AYP Status for Appoquinimink Schools • Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus

  3. 2010 DSTP Results

  4. Appoquinimink and Statewide Trends • Graphs indicate percentage that meets or exceeds the standard in math and reading for grades 3,5,8, and 10. • Two lines, one indicating Appoquinimink’s percentage of students who meet or exceed the standard, the other indicates the State of Delaware’s.

  5. 3rd Grade Reading DSTP

  6. 5th Grade Reading DSTP

  7. 8th Grade Reading DSTP

  8. 10th Grade Reading DSTP

  9. Grade by Grade Reading Rankings (% Meets)

  10. 3rd Grade Math DSTP

  11. 5th Grade Math DSTP

  12. 8th Grade Math DSTP

  13. 10th Grade Math DSTP

  14. Grade by Grade Math Rankings (% Meets)

  15. Context is Important: 2009/2010 was a Unique Year • Reading Accommodation Changes • Shorter Instructional Window due to Unusual Winter Weather (one and a half weeks lost) • Professional Development Days Eliminated • New Reading Curriculum for Grades 1-6 • Higher Percentage of Low Income Students

  16. Percentage of Low Income Students

  17. Relationship between Poverty and DSTP Pass Rates

  18. 2010 AYP Determinations

  19. 2 Key Factors Impacting AYP • Rising Performance Standards • Cell Counts

  20. Rising Performance Standards 84% 75%

  21. School Performance

  22. Rising Performance Standards Academic Review Superior

  23. Cell Counts Which School Missed AYP?

  24. MUST HAVE >40 STUDENTS TO COUNT

  25. Statewide AYP-Meeting Schools by Type

  26. School/Program Evaluation

  27. MHS: Commendable

  28. AHS: Academic Review

  29. AGW: Superior

  30. MMS: Academic Progress

  31. RMS: Academic Progress

  32. BHE: Superior

  33. BME: Superior

  34. CLE: Superior

  35. OBL: Superior

  36. SLE: Academic Watch

  37. TES: Superior

  38. Percentage Low Income by Appo School

  39. 2010 Key Areas of Focus

  40. Appoquinimink Key Areas of Focus New Student Performance Elementary Special Education Performance High Performing Students

  41. The Scope of the Number of New Students Entering For the 2010 DSTP testing session, 6363 students were tested. 661 were not enrolled in Appoquinimink School District last year. That’s roughly 1 in 10 students new to the District, or about 2 or 3 per class.

  42. New Student Reading Performance

  43. New Student Math Performance

  44. Special Education Percentage that Meets the Standard

  45. Reading National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 from MAP Assessment

  46. Math National Percentile Ranks Spring 2010 (from MAP Assessment)

  47. Thank You

More Related