1 / 13

NEEO Workpackage 5

NEEO Workpackage 5. NEEO Project Meeting - 4 Leuven, Belgium March 5th, 2009. Benoit PAUWELS Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels. General coordination. Revised planning for WP5 Total budget for WP5 remains unchanged Approved by PMB [Brainstorming] meetings

ayita
Download Presentation

NEEO Workpackage 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEEO Workpackage 5 NEEO Project Meeting - 4 Leuven, Belgium March 5th, 2009 Benoit PAUWELS Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Brussels

  2. General coordination • Revised planning for WP5 • Total budget for WP5 remainsunchanged • Approved by PMB • [Brainstorming] meetings • @TU - with EUR, TU, ULB • EUR explains findings and first results wrt automated JEL classification of publications • First agreement on metadata enrichment infrastructure; we agree to publish an article on this • @ULB – WP6/MLIA -- withKULeuven, ULB, Prof. Bouillon • Results of studentthesis • @Skype – WP6/MLIA – withKULeuven, TU, ULB • conclusion on the wayforward for implementation and integration of MLIA solution in the EO Gateway • @KULeuven – with EUR, TU, ULB • integration of enrichedmetadatainto EO Gateway

  3. Adaptation IR solution • DIDL/MODS • Implementationsavailable • Dspace (4), Arno (2), Eprints (1), homemade(1) • Non-corepartners: Kiel, Columbia University • Start testingintegrationinto EO Gateway • Deadline for all: 30/4/2009 • Personalized message sent to all non-corepartners

  4. Technical guidelines • Annex 3 (Admin file) -- version 1.2integration of « RePEc story » • SpecifywhichRepecseries to feedfrom EO • SpecifywhichRepecseries not to harvestinto EO • Outstanding issues: • Publication types nomenclature • need for a cleardecision, preferrably in synergywith SURF and Driver • DAI • « authority » attribute -- solved • include multiple identifiers of an author (e.g. Repec ID)

  5. Usage metadata • WP5-TWG decides on OAI-PMH exchange of SWUP ContextObjects • Technical guidelines version 1.2 • Outstanding issues: • algorithm for encryption of IP addresses • list of robot IP addresses and regular expressions • Implementation: • Alpha implementation on DSpaceavailable (ULB) • All corepartnersinvited to implementbefore 30/4/2009

  6. Metadataenrichment • JEL enrichment: seepresentation of Peter • Started (yesterday) brainstorm on implementation of tools for extraction and transformation of bibliographicreferences

  7. EO Gateway • Specifications • Usage metadatadatabase (TU, ULB) • Massagingraw data throughoff-lineprocesses, sothateasily usable within portal and usage reports • MLIA related issues (KULeuven, TU, ULB) • Formal agreement with CACAO • Need to agree on detailedspecifications for smoothintegrationinto EO • Integration of enrichedmetadata(EUR, TU, ULB) • First report withideastabled and discussedduring meeting yesterday • Planned: implementation of prototype • (Publish article on this) • Harvestingotherresources in economics : SSRN? Others? • Disseminating EO content to others: SSRN? Others?

  8. Full-textsearchengine • Meresco supports full-textindexing and searching • working on a planning, togetherwith CQ2 RSS • Meresco supports RSS service • TODO: (needssomefurtherresearch) • support for CQL query • RSS output

  9. EO RePEc archive • Agreement from RePEc people on amendment to ReDIF exchange format • « proposalis sensible » • not all of the RePEc service providers are too happy having to implementthis • ULB implemented • Part of (ECO-) IR of ULB is made available to RePEc service providers to playaroundwith in their interfaces • Outstanding issue to implement: « RePEc ID » of author

  10. EO portal • Version with basic functionality: launched on 2 Feb • Overview document with outstanding issues, bugs, … • 150 issues • SeeFred’spresentation and demo EO publication lists • PDF, RTF • Grouped and sorted on type of publication and date

  11. EO portal • Design of final version of portal: « advanced » functionalityneeds to come in: • Revision of the layout of the portal • Portal for the visually impaired • Export facilities • Publication lists • Integration of enriched metadata (JEL and references) • RSS • Translation into the 3 remaining languages • Multilingual JEL browsing • MLIA • EO Usage services / EO Usage reports • Portal available as portlet • WP5-IWG isworking on proposal; to bediscussedtomorrowmorning

  12. Overview of upcoming actions • DIDL/MODS • all -- 30/4/2009 • XML Admin file • all -- 30/4/2009 • OAI/SWUP • corepartners -- 30/4/2009 • others – asapafter 30/4/2009 • Testing, feedback, bug reporting and solving • all -- continuous

  13. Overview of upcoming actions • WP5 brainstormer group and WP5-TWG • Finalize DIDL/MODS guidelines: publication types, RePEc ID • Finalize usage metadata guidelines (robots, encryption of IP address) • Specifications for gatewaywithadvancedfeatures • usage metadatadatabase • integration of enrichedmetadata • MLIA (with CACAO) • multilingual JEL • Tools for references extraction and transformation • WP5-IWG • Design and integration of advancedfunctionality in the portal • TU: implementation of • Portal • RSS • EO RePEc archive • Full-textindexing • Usage metadatadatabase

More Related