90 likes | 197 Views
Leadership Project 2010-2011. Self-evaluation and Planning. The project:. Originally a fixture on timetable, but to be done in accordance with curriculum for excellence and on a bigger scale – ALL DEPTS. An S2 Citizenship week
E N D
Leadership Project 2010-2011 Self-evaluation and Planning
The project: • Originally a fixture on timetable, but to be done in accordance with curriculum for excellence and on a bigger scale – ALL DEPTS. • An S2 Citizenship week • For all S2 in all subjects – for some this entailed cross cutting themes so curriculum didn’t change e.g. Art. For others it was a break from their pre-planned lessons.
Things to consider • Who to involve – approaching staff • Timing – big impact on learning experiences, small impact on timetable and staff time. • How to communicate – divide tasks and find best way to communicate at various points of project. • How to encourage/and support staff when going back to departments. • Budget.
Planning and preparation • Timeline – achievable goals, realistic timescale. People you are leading need plenty of notice. • Communication – use an appropriate form of communication for the task/issue. General reminders – email. Specific issues, face to face contact. • Prioritise tasks and share responsibility or leadership opportunities – leading a project, not doing the whole thing yourself.
…planning and preparation… • Go to the right people for advice – has anyone done something similar? Mentor conversations – advice on how best to approach people or even who to approach. • Any feedback /conversation/ incident at all can help you to plan next steps/ take project in different direction.
Self evaluation through reflection • Mentor Conversations. • ANY conversations re project. Write up any feedback in LEARNING JOURNAL • Leave spaces in Learning Journal – only really work if go back and can comment on what you’ve learned and how you will use this. • Critical Incident Analysis sheet/template. • Evaluate along the way to map out next steps, but evidence this evaluation, if that direction doesn’t work can go back and try something else. • Existing templates of evaluation – SWOT analysis, Johari’s Windows, existing DIP template for timeline and monitoring progress etc.
End of project • Feedback – was very important. Evaluation of the project automatically lead to self evaluation – why didn’t they enjoy that particular aspect? What went well? Do I want to run this again? Can it be sustained? Can it be made bigger? Where can I go from here? • Identified any particular strengths, and self evaluation made me think about where to go from here – Learning Rounds post/ PELP. • Start process again: