LIFE CYCLE LOGISTICS FUNCTIONAL IPT ( LOG FIPT)

1. LIFE CYCLE LOGISTICS FUNCTIONAL IPT ( LOG FIPT) Mr John Baranowski, Acting DASD(MR) ODASD(MR) John.Baranowski@OSD.MIL 703-614-6137 21 Oct 2011

2. Opening Remarks

3. PSEC Purpose, Objectives and Agenda • Purpose: • Update PSEC members of progress to date and gain consensus on the way ahead • Objectives: • Obtain concurrence with the PSAT Strategic Plan • Provide an update on PSAT IPT activities • Determine the PSEC way ahead

4. The Product Support Journey NextGen Adoption Concept Policy Section 912, 1998 NDAA: DoD to report to Congress on Product Support Reengineering Product Support Reengineering Report to Congress DoD QDR mandates “PBL” – First official Use of Term DoD 5000 policy updated: PBL is “preferred” Support Strategy Revised DoDI 5000.2 Issued DoD Weapon System Acquisition Reform Product Support Assessment PSAT Implementation Next Gen Product Support PSM Section 805 Implementation, Proof Point Assessment Phase 1, Institutionalization of Sustainment Quad Chart PSM, BCA, ILA, Post-IOC Review Guidebooks; Proof Point Assessment Phase 2 ACAT 1 & 2 to use PBL or justify non-use DoD WSAR-PSA Implementation Product Support Assessment Team Launched Program Managers Guidebook published 30 RTOC Pilot Programs Next Generation F-117, APU PBLs 1998 1999 2001 2003 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

5. Senior Steering Group Message – DEC 2008 “Now is the Right Time—For the Right Reasons—to Revisit Life Cycle Product Support” • New political environment • Anticipated financial pressure • Wartime largesse • Quantum improvement in equipment, IT, and data engines • Decade of experience with PBL – need to incorporate learning Warfighter deserves no less Good stewardship Maximizes effectiveness and efficiency of Life Cycle dollar Military operations are more precise and reliable, logistics must continue to do the same This is about enterprise life cycle product support leadership

6. Product Support Executive CouncilRoles & Responsibilities Governance Roles Vision & Guiding Principles • Prioritize implementation to align with stakeholder strategies • Provide visibility of and support for recommendations • Ensure actions fulfill life cycle product support vision and guiding principles • Agenda largely formed by IPT status accounting

7. PSAT Objectives and Long Term Success Indicators

8. PSAT Addresses Weapon System Program Challenges • Lessons learned from the Overarching Integrated Project Team (OIPT) and Defense Acquisition Board (DAB) meetings yield program improvement opportunities: • Improve product support strategies • Provide better business case analyses • Demonstrate management of sustainment key performance parameters (KPPs) • Peer reviews • Other

9. PSAT Integrated Project Team (IPT) Summary

10. IPT 1 – Product Support Business Model

11. IPT 2 – Governance

12. IPT 3 – Human Capital

13. PSAT Challenges • PSAT momentum continues, needs some run time • Products are being socialized, Services are in the process of implementing products • Feedback encouraged from PM/PSM’s on how products are being used in the development and execution of product support strategies • Industry looking for PSAT evidence in RFPs • PSEC support encouraged to assist and re-enforce PSAT Vision/Strategies • Leverage PSEC / PSAT structure to address gaps and redundancies • Need to strengthen PSAT relationship with financial and contract management communities

14. Evolving Role of the PSEC

15. Leveraging the PSEC For Best Practices and Improved Product Support • Business Model: • Only group that leverages commercial and governmentcross -functional and cross-organizational stakeholders. • How do we capitalize on this diversity to improve PSBM? • Proven success at rapidly delivering useful products • What needs to be done to operationalize products? Governance: • How should the PSEC inform OSD AT&L Policy? • How should product support issues be addressed by the PSEC? • How do we improve financial and product performance accountability?

16. Strawman - Program Support Issues from the Executive Council Perspective Human Capital: • What needs to be done to better use the PSAT products? • How do we keep the momentum and focus on next step recommendations? • Is communication adequate? (newsletters, semi-annual meetings) • Clarity on in-sourcing requirement

17. DoDI 5000.02 Policy Update

18. Progress in the DoDI 5000.02 update • Solicit fact of life inputs • Draft enclosure • Synchronize various inputs • Formal staffing/adjudication of comments • Signature • Release Life Cycle Sustainment Plan Outline • Update Defense Acquisition Guide Chapter 5 • Example facts of life: • DTM 10-015 • PDUSD(AT&L) memo: Document Streamlining – Life Cycle Sustainment Plan Outline Just discussed Workshop scheduled for tomorrow

19. Policy, guidance, and oversight are the core of the ODASD(MR) engagement model DASD (MR) engagement model DoDI 5000.02 Life-Cycle Sustainment Enclosure Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP) Outline Policy Program tool that evolves throughout the Lifecycle • PSAT Guidebooks • PSM • BCA • Log Assessments Defense Acquisition Guidebook (Chapter 5), update underway Guidance Post IOC • Action Officer/Program Collaboration • IIPT, OIPT, DAB decision support • DAES, DAMIR, SARs Oversight Operations and Sustainment Acquisition Program Manager Product Support Manager MS A MS B MS C FRP/ IOC Continual review cycle Acquisition Strategy and other Acquisition Management Docs Life-Cycle Sustainment Plan, BCA, Log Assessments/Reviews Planned Sustainment Performance Actual Sustainment Performance

20. The streamlining memo for the LCSP will be formalize in the DoDI 5000.02 update LCSP Review and Approval: Per the TDS/AS memorandum, the LCSP has been separated from the AS. Every acquisition program shall develop a LCSP. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness (ASD(L&MR)) shall approve LCSPs for all ACAT ID and USD(AT&L) designated special interest programs for Milestone A or equivalent, each subsequent milestone, and Full-Rate Production decision. Following the system’s initial operating capability (IOC), the component acquisition executive (CAE) or designee shall approve LCSP updates, in coordination with the ASD(L&MR). Approval for ACAT IC and below LCSPs is delegated to the CAE or Component designee.

21. Questions