210 likes | 348 Views
Integrated Stave Electrical and Assembly. ATLAS Upgrade Workshop December 2007 H.Chen, J.Kierstad, Z. Li. D. Lissauer, D. Lynn, Y.Semetzvidis Brookhaven National Laboratory R.P. Ely, M.Gilchriese, C.Haber, B.Leung, T.Phung Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
E N D
Integrated Stave Electrical and Assembly ATLAS Upgrade Workshop December 2007 H.Chen, J.Kierstad, Z. Li. D. Lissauer, D. Lynn, Y.Semetzvidis Brookhaven National Laboratory R.P. Ely, M.Gilchriese, C.Haber, B.Leung, T.Phung Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Anu Tuononen (Polytecnic Kuopio), Giulio Villani, Marc Weber Rutherford Appelton Lab Vitaliy Fadeyev, Jason Nielsen SCIPP UC Santa Cruz
Prototypes and Designs 60 cm, 9 cm strip, 6 segments/side Stave-06 1 meter, 3 cm strip, 30 segments/side 192 Watts (ABCD chip), ~2.4 % Xo + support structure 6 x 3 cm, 6 chips wide Stave-07 Build and test Study 1 meter, 2.5 cm strip, 40 segments/side 200-250 Watts (@0.25 W/chip) ~1.9 – 2.2 % Xo + support 10 x 10 cm, 10 chips wide Stave-08
What Has Been Done • Prototypes fabricated and studied • New DAQ system for multi-module tests • Stave-06 • Stave-07 • Transmission lines • Designs and concepts • Bus cables and signal distribution for Stave-08 10 x 10 • Material estimates • Bridged hybrid • Module overide and failure bypassing
New Stave Test DAQ • A bench top system easily configured for parallel testing large numbers of modules • Use off-the-shelf PXI based DAQ cards from National Instruments • PXI-656X 16 channels of LVDS I/O, multiple card system • 160 Mb/s system • Significant on-board memory/channel 2,16, or 128 Mb/channel • But no hardware histogramming • Software “StaveDAQ” contains all the existing SCT tests • Noise interference and external trigger tests included • Configurable framework to handle any combination of components, multiple cards • Reporting, data access, and comparison tools 10-20-30 module system
StaveDAQ: 6 chip plots S-curve Threshold scan Strobe delay VT50 Gain Out noise In noise Performance vs channel @0.5 fc
Stave-06 • Stave-06 results have been presented at the 2006 Hiroshima and IEEE NSS meetings and published. • Good noise performance was demonstrated. • Noise interference was studied • Serial powering & LVDS multidrop demonstrated on 6 modules/hybrids • Stave-06 studies at LBL and RAL
Stave-07 • The fabrication of Stave-07 (3 cm strip, DS) is underway • Mechanical parts are ready (see Gil’s talk) • Hybrid is ready • 1st module fabricated and under study • Assembly fixtures have been fabricated • Final fabrication is bus cable, design complete • Develop assembly and test procedure/fixtures, production-like • Goal is to have results for April 2008 review • Electrical performance • Mechanical and cooling • Assembly experience leading to work and time estimates for production • Cost and effort models
AV-MOD DVDD AG-MOD DV-MOD DG DG-MOD Development of Hybrid for Stave-07 • Integrate 6 ABCD plus serial power, LVDS AC coupling • 63.54 x 15 mm on 375 micron BeO substrate • Components sized to hold off > 150 volts • HV filtering and bypass • Integrated into full stave + bus cable design • Redundant connections for testing AC gnd AG-MOD HV Gnd HV in AV-MOD
Hybrid Design and Test Analog current Ground layer Analog power Power layer Digital power LVDS section Serial power section
Module Assembly and Test Fixture Evolve asingle fixture for assembly, bonding, inspection, and test.
Bus Cable Data Readout 1/hybrid Serial current return Clock & Command lines Serial current link HV distribution
Bus Cable Geometry and Impedance Materials: Al foil 2mil, Dupont LF0100, Shinetsu CA333 2 mils, Cu 18 um, Kapton 1 mil, Adhesive 2 Al 1 ADHESIVE 1 ~1 Cu 0.7 1 KAPTON 1 CF >>Matches measured impedance Couple this to further measurements – see J.Nielsen talk of 12/11
Specific Goals of Study • Performance on standard SCT tests • Noise interference • Behavior of serial powering with large number of modules • HV bypass, coupling, in serial system • Clock and command distribution, transmission performance • Input to ABC-next design If the Stave-07 program is successful and the community wants to proceed in this general direction then Stave-08 would follow but this should be a broader effort. In the meantime we would do limited studies related to Stave-08
Stave-08 Options and Studies • Mechanical/thermal study showed that bridge and hermeticity are options • Hybrid/Module • If we glue directly to silicon we want a low e dielectric substrate • BeO + thick film was a readily available choice for Stave-07 • If we bridge then other considerations can dominate • Material, cost, thermal • Kapton + copper may be a more natural choice, even for direct gluing on silicon • Less material • Easier to connect to bus cable? • For direct glue still use a BeO substrate below kapton • Glue-on-silicon study: can this be done in a definitive way? • Consideration of electrical failure recovery and bypassing • Bus Cable • Natural impedance is in the 65-75 ohm range • How should TTC be distributed? Multidrops • Do we need to zig-zag traces to minimize coupling? • How thick should the shield be? How should shield be grounded? • Wirebond or direct connections?
Design of Bus for 10 x10 Sensors If diagonal lines not required have ~40% open space
Material • Contribution of mechanical core + cooling ~0.4 % (Gil’s talk) • Consider BeO hybrids on surface and Kapton+CC bridge • Include all electrical components • Hybrids • Chips • Discrete components • Bus cables • BeO on surface = 2 x 0.89 = 1.8 % (+ mechanical) = 2.2 % • Kapton +CC = 2 x 0.75 = 1.5 % (+mechanical) = 1.9 % • Support cylinder not included
Stave Review Considerations • With a review in 4-2008 all information will be based upon • Design studies • Stave-06, 07 experience • Process of addressing review panels detailed list • Specifics • Xo • Bridge / no Bridge • Electrical performance • Tracking performance • Radial plane separation, stereo measurement • Alignment • Hermeticity • Cost • Assembly procedure and tooling • Repair • Compatibility with forward designs • Special materials and processes
Required Information • Stereo measurement precision (16mm(rf), 500mm(z); max separation between planes?) • Need to describe here how the precision is maintained over the full tracking volume (assembly precision, survey, stability, monitoring, alignment) RESPONSE: description of measurement, tooling, QA, process…. • Readout and electronics based on system architecture document & consistent with options under evaluation. Supply details of: • Grounding scheme: RESPONSE: description of bus cable for serial and DC-DC…. • Powering scheme(s): RESPONSE: key aspect of R&D underway • Monitoring: RESPONSE: factor into design of bus cable • Compatibility with reuse of existing services • Requirement for any new services to be detailed:RESPONSE: common to all schemes • Radiation qualification of all materials and assemblies. Describe qualification measurements RESPONSE – qualification of adhesives, carbon materials, issue of direct gluing to silicon… • Compatibility with trigger requirements - rf position of strips known to …
Performance Information • Material per tracking layer in radiation lengths including • Module/stave = 1.9 – 2.4 % • Overlaps to achieve hermeticity below : see mechanical talk, determined by bias ring width • Attachments to external support structure & assumed support structure:TBD • Attachments to cooling, the cooling pipe including connections:none, embedded, issue of coupling to external is common • Electrical connectors and intermediate servicesindependent • Hermeticity of each layer i.e. fraction of tracks fully measured: if overlaps then common to all schemes, otherwise need to calculate • Precision achieved for the whole tracker • Thermal run-away margin : see mechanical / cooling
Risks: Electrical + Assembly • Identify components which are ‘single-source limited sources for hybrids BeO or Kapton • List components or assembly steps which need to be developed or qualified • Front side gluing • Are electrical connections wirebonded, soldered, or connectors? • Assembly process needs to further developed and qualified • How deep is the assembly pipeline? level of prototyping effort required to fully validate design? Would clearly have to build full-scale prototype(s) for electrical performance and alignment • Risk due to tight mechanical tolerances during assembly Moderate, similar to past experience • Grounding & shielding risks key aspect of the electrical study, bus cable, HV and bypass • Options available for repair i.e. the risk of damage being unrepairable. • Module/stave damaged during shipping or testing Replace module or toss out • Module/stave damaged during assembly to structures Replace module or toss out • Flexibility or options to modify the design based on experience with ATLAS. • Could the material be reduced further? And at what cost? Only if granularity is reduced • Could additional measurement layers be introduced? Sure • Are there options to improve grounding and shielding? Increase bus cable shield, various grounding options are included in prototyping • Other technical, schedule or financial risks • Design of bus cable and signal transmission issues • Need to decide on number of TTC, data lines • Bridge or No-Bridge, effect of glue on silicon
Summary Conclusions • Steady program of measurements, prototypes, and design study • Look forward to key measurements from Stave-07 • Serial powering with 30 steps • Signal transmission • Electrical performance, grounding and shielding • Valuable inputs to production, assembly basis, cost estimates • Have addressed some key concerns raised by the community • Repair • Hermeticity • Bridge • Embedding this work in Review Committee framework • Clear program for future work if this is a good direction…