70 likes | 80 Views
Explore the dynamic evolution of accountability in the UCEDD over the past 30 years, transitioning from a deficit model to a proactive strengths-based approach. It delves into core functions, program logic models, and impact assessments, emphasizing partnerships and consumer involvement for quality enhancement. Discover the recommendations for relevant program criteria, site visits, technical assistance, reporting, and the new level of consumer and family involvement.
E N D
About Accountability • It is a partnership- both parties are responsible • ADD invests in UCEDD and in the AUCD network • Both are responsible to be clear • Who we are accountable to: • Funding sources: ADD, MCH, NIH, etc. • University, state, community, consumers and family members
Evolution of Accountability Transition in the field over past 30 years Deficit model to proactive strengths-based model Quality Enhancement as opposed to Quality Assurance Core Functions and Impact Program logic model- clear understanding of what inputs, outputs, outcomes (short term, long term impacts) Understanding of impact of partnerships
Recommendations Partnerships Relevant Program Criteria Return to Site Visits Technical Assistance Reporting- NIRS and annual reports New level of consumer and family involvement Trust