1 / 23

The Value of Systems Integration

Johnson Controls, Inc Pulse 2008 Conference. The Value of Systems Integration. Value of Integration. Defining hidden functional failures or actual alarms Knowledge of developing operational Issues Capacity, configuration & installation mgmt. Identify root cause & effect

tracen
Download Presentation

The Value of Systems Integration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Johnson Controls, Inc Pulse 2008 Conference The Value of Systems Integration

  2. Value of Integration • Defining hidden functional failures or actual alarms • Knowledge of developing operational Issues • Capacity, configuration & installation mgmt. • Identify root cause & effect • Automate - On-condition tasking, facility org. • Remediate issues before they become alarms • Sustaining energy efficiency targets • Actual cost allocations based on data.

  3. Today’s Issues • Hidden Issues w/ financial & Ops consequences • Little knowledge of cause and effect • No reliable tie to energy benchmarks • Inconsistent condition validation • Inconsistent operational efficiency • Manual Method of information transfer to the maintenance organization • Limited use of technology for cost allocation.

  4. Integration of Information Tivoli Integrator Metasys Solution Team Process Technology People Maximo

  5. Case Study – Value of Integration • Value of system data for cause & effect • Value of condition indicators • Energy as a “Sentinel” indicator • Automated “Conditional” work order generation • Optimization of energy usage • Discovery of “hidden” functional failures.

  6. Background Information • Problem – Spot Capacity Issue • 60K Sq ft of Raised Floor • 2 floors 30K sq. ft. each • Chilled water loop, 60 CRAC Units (Total) • 50% of CRAC Units fully configured

  7. Defining the Scope & Scale of the Issue Source: • BAS • NMS • Manual Data • collection

  8. Integration of System Data Source: NMS • Integration of: • IT System • Information

  9. Integration of Configuration Data Source: CMMS • Integration of: • Configuration • Drawings

  10. Quantify Performance via Energy usage Source: BAS/CMMS Measure Operational Efficiency against baseline

  11. Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator Source: CMMS (Historical) .600 Baseline Ratio Current Ratio

  12. Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator Source: BAS (Current) Baseline Ratio .600 2.580 .608 Current Ratio

  13. CMMS - Job Plan Auto Generation

  14. CRAC Unit Operating Signatures • Integration of • IT System • Information • Drawings • BAS • Manual Data Verification of Performance

  15. CRAC Unit – Poor Operating Signature

  16. CMMS - Job Plan Execution

  17. CRAC Unit – Good Operating Signature

  18. Review - (Signature Before)

  19. Validation of Results - (After) • Validate Results • of Remediation • Activities • IT NMS • BAS

  20. Case Study Results • Temperature variances mitigated • Gain back of 68 tons of cooling • Decrease of 280 KW of energy consumption • IT server performance: extended MTBF • Process used to adjust maintenance plans • On condition tasking • Continuous verification of performance vs. baseline • Validation effect of maintenance with energy usage • Financial gain - $97.5K/year, 1 location

  21. Summary – Process Automation Integrator Metasys Tivoli Solution Team Process Technology People Maximo

  22. Summary - Value of Integration • ID of Hidden functional failures – No alarms present • Knowledge of developing operational Issues • Automation of on-condition tasking for facility org. • Identification of root cause & effect • Mgmt of load to available resources (Capacity Mgmt) • Record of asset/system information & trends (CMMS) • Sustaining energy efficiency targets • Optimized operating costs & allocations. • Installation Management

  23. Thank You!

More Related