230 likes | 357 Views
Johnson Controls, Inc Pulse 2008 Conference. The Value of Systems Integration. Value of Integration. Defining hidden functional failures or actual alarms Knowledge of developing operational Issues Capacity, configuration & installation mgmt. Identify root cause & effect
E N D
Johnson Controls, Inc Pulse 2008 Conference The Value of Systems Integration
Value of Integration • Defining hidden functional failures or actual alarms • Knowledge of developing operational Issues • Capacity, configuration & installation mgmt. • Identify root cause & effect • Automate - On-condition tasking, facility org. • Remediate issues before they become alarms • Sustaining energy efficiency targets • Actual cost allocations based on data.
Today’s Issues • Hidden Issues w/ financial & Ops consequences • Little knowledge of cause and effect • No reliable tie to energy benchmarks • Inconsistent condition validation • Inconsistent operational efficiency • Manual Method of information transfer to the maintenance organization • Limited use of technology for cost allocation.
Integration of Information Tivoli Integrator Metasys Solution Team Process Technology People Maximo
Case Study – Value of Integration • Value of system data for cause & effect • Value of condition indicators • Energy as a “Sentinel” indicator • Automated “Conditional” work order generation • Optimization of energy usage • Discovery of “hidden” functional failures.
Background Information • Problem – Spot Capacity Issue • 60K Sq ft of Raised Floor • 2 floors 30K sq. ft. each • Chilled water loop, 60 CRAC Units (Total) • 50% of CRAC Units fully configured
Defining the Scope & Scale of the Issue Source: • BAS • NMS • Manual Data • collection
Integration of System Data Source: NMS • Integration of: • IT System • Information
Integration of Configuration Data Source: CMMS • Integration of: • Configuration • Drawings
Quantify Performance via Energy usage Source: BAS/CMMS Measure Operational Efficiency against baseline
Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator Source: CMMS (Historical) .600 Baseline Ratio Current Ratio
Energy as a “Sentinel” Indicator Source: BAS (Current) Baseline Ratio .600 2.580 .608 Current Ratio
CRAC Unit Operating Signatures • Integration of • IT System • Information • Drawings • BAS • Manual Data Verification of Performance
Validation of Results - (After) • Validate Results • of Remediation • Activities • IT NMS • BAS
Case Study Results • Temperature variances mitigated • Gain back of 68 tons of cooling • Decrease of 280 KW of energy consumption • IT server performance: extended MTBF • Process used to adjust maintenance plans • On condition tasking • Continuous verification of performance vs. baseline • Validation effect of maintenance with energy usage • Financial gain - $97.5K/year, 1 location
Summary – Process Automation Integrator Metasys Tivoli Solution Team Process Technology People Maximo
Summary - Value of Integration • ID of Hidden functional failures – No alarms present • Knowledge of developing operational Issues • Automation of on-condition tasking for facility org. • Identification of root cause & effect • Mgmt of load to available resources (Capacity Mgmt) • Record of asset/system information & trends (CMMS) • Sustaining energy efficiency targets • Optimized operating costs & allocations. • Installation Management