FREWG identifies specific evaluation question(s) by resource value

1. Version 1.0 February 08, 2005 : FRPA Resource Evaluation Program and Forest Practices Board roles and responsibilities in the development and implementation of indicators for effectiveness evaluation/stewardship monitoring Start FP Board public report FREWG identifies specific evaluation question(s) by resource value FREWG assigns resource value team leaders • RVTLs create expert team (RVT) • multi-agency • academics • others RVT drafts indicators and field procedures RVT revise indicators and procedures FP Board Pilot audit FP develop indicators required to complete audit Field Test RVT team field test Stakeholder input FP expert RVT revisions to indicators and procedures Resource stewardship monitoring pilots Post Pilot de-briefing (FREWG) FREP/RSMP field implementation version of indicators and procedures FREP/RSMP Field implementation FP Board 2004 audit and public report • Data Analysis • district • regionial • provincial To date Future date Available for future FP Board use • Local continuous improvement through: • better FSP objectives and on the ground practices • informing professional accountability Ongoing field implementation and improvements • Regional continuous improvement through: • regional trends and issues • identify “red flags” • training and extension • quality management Public reporting Future audit/special investigation(s) Recommendations to government or licensees • Provincial continuous improvement through: • investigating red flags in detail • standardized protocols and process • modelling field data • communicate results and recommendations to policy table • improved legislation and policy FP Board Input to “policy table” Special report Legend: FREP FRPA Resource Evaluation Program RSMP Resource Stewardship Monitoring Program FREWG FRPA Resource Evaluation Program Working Group (MOF, WLAP, MSRM) FP Board Forest Practices Board RVTL Resource value team leader RVT Resource value team DDM Delegated decision maker