1 / 46

Prise en charge du cancer epidermoide du canal anal

Conflits d'int?r?tsAmgenRoche. Journ?es Francophones d'H?pato-gastroent?rologie et d'Oncologie Digestive 2011 . Enum?rer Principales classifications (atteinte tumorale) Bilan pr?-th?rapeutique D?tailler Modalit?s th?rapeutiques non chirurgicales La place de la chirurgie Identifier et

gale
Download Presentation

Prise en charge du cancer epidermoide du canal anal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    9. Role of human papillomavirus (HPV) integration in the progression from normal epithelium to invasive carcinoma. L-SIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; H-SIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.Role of human papillomavirus (HPV) integration in the progression from normal epithelium to invasive carcinoma. L-SIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; H-SIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

    27. RT + MMC + 5-FU UKCCR ACT I RT + MMC + 5-FU > RT UKCCR et al., Lancet 348:1049-54, 1996 EORTC RT + MMC + 5-FU > RT Bartelink et al., J Clin Oncol 15:2040-9, 1997 RTOG 87-04/ECOG 1289 RT + MMC + 5-FU > RT + 5-FU Flam et al., J Clin Oncol 14:2527-2539, 1996

    31. Amélioration des toxicités

    33. ACT II: The second UK phase III Anal Cancer Trial « A randomized trial of chemoradiation using MMC or cisplatin with or without maintenance (cisplatin/5-FU) in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus »

    34. Factorial design I. Chemoradiation comparison

    35. CRT Comparison Complete Response at 6 months

    38. Results: Grade 3 & 4 Acute Toxicity During Chemoradiation 1 cardiac 5-FU death 1 neutropaenic sepsis – not picked up and acted on in time – subject of internal enquiry – cross sites1 cardiac 5-FU death 1 neutropaenic sepsis – not picked up and acted on in time – subject of internal enquiry – cross sites

    39. Comment faire pour améliorer ? Modifier la technique (tissus sains) Augmenter la dose de radiothérapie ACCORD 03 Modifier la stratégie de la CT Neoadjuvante ACCORD 03 RTOG 98-11 Maintenance ACT II Thérapies ciblées ACCORD 16

    40. Toxicités tardives

    42. Chirurgie de sauvetage? ?Rôle de la qualité de la résection Rouqie, J Chir, 2008 95 AAP suivi 5 ans ?Seul facteur pronostique : résection R0 (n=76) versus R1 (n=9) ou R2 (n=9) ?Survie médiane : R0 > 10 ans versus 1 an pour R1 et R2 (p=0.001)

    43. Surveillance

More Related